Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34041

Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/26/2016 3:44 PM, Popping mad wrote:
> When I try to compile this (example from antlr4 FIWIW)
>

> public class Main {
>      public static void main(String[] args) {

> 		 CollectVarsVisitor my_visitor = new CollectVarsVisitor();

> 	 public class CollectVarsVisitor extends CalcBaseVisitor<Void> {

> it says
>
> [ruben@manjaro calculator]$ javac Main.java
> Main.java:15: error: non-static variable this cannot be referenced from a
> static context
>                   CollectVarsVisitor my_visitor = new CollectVarsVisitor();
>                                                   ^
> 1 error
>
> I have no clue what is the problem, but it is not a standard static
> problem

Other have already pointed out the problem.

But let me try and elaborate.

Or maybe add to the confusion.

:-)

When a class is declared inside another class with static then
it is just another class with an unusual name and more complex
accessibility.

Example:

public class Main1 {
	// note static
	public static class Foobar {
		@Override
		public String toString() {
			return super.toString();
		}
	}
	public void test() {
		// full syntax
		Main1.Foobar a = new Main1.Foobar();
		System.out.println(a);
		// abbreviated syntax
		Foobar b = new Foobar();
		System.out.println(b);
	}
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		Main1 o = new Main1();
		o.test();
	}
}

When it is declared without static, then each instance
belong to an instance of the outer class. And in fact code
can refer to that using classname.this syntax.

Example:

public class Main2 {
	// note not static
	public class Foobar {
		@Override
		public String toString() {
			return super.toString() + "/" + Main2.this.toString();
		}
	}
	public void test() {
		// full syntax
		Main2.Foobar a = this.new Foobar();
		System.out.println(a);
		// abbreviated syntax
		Foobar b = new Foobar();
		System.out.println(b);
	}
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		Main2 o = new Main2();
		o.test();
	}
}

(and your problem as pointed out by several other was that you had
this case and were using the abbreviated syntax with an implicit this
prefix on new - an getting the error because in the static main there
is no this)

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why does Java argue about making a class instance Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-03-26 19:44 +0000
  Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2016-03-26 21:01 +0100
    Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-03-28 13:19 +0000
      Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-28 14:59 -0400
  Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-26 16:04 -0400
    Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-03-28 13:24 +0000
      Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-28 09:50 -0400
      Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-28 15:04 -0400
        Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 15:17 -0700
          Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-03-28 18:30 -0400
  Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2016-03-26 20:17 +0000
  Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-03-28 10:10 -0400
  Re: Why does Java argue about making a class instance Roedy Green <inquiry@mindprod.com> - 2016-06-29 00:56 -0700

csiph-web