Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33021

Re: Performance JPA

From Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Performance JPA
Date 2015-11-07 22:18 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <n1meu6$anc$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <56389a9e$0$23778$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <n1bnte$2j8$2@speranza.aioe.org> <5639ce9d$0$23755$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <87611ihxee.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <5639ef43$0$23781$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/4/2015 6:42 AM, Silvio wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:27 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> The application uses a lot of lists and they acknowledge that
>> something goes wrong with list fetching. But because ‘only’ the DAO
>> changed this could not be the problem. How do I pinpoint this problem?
>>
>
> Well, that depends on what you can look at. The executed SQL would be a
> dead giveaway but it appears you can not get to that easily.
>
> List of entities can be populated in different ways. I have seen cases
> where an initial select would only fetch a whole bunch of primary keys
> and then the entities where fetched by key. Of course this is the result
> of bad application code but it is not at all uncommon, especially if the
> code was written by people with less experience using ORMs.

I have not seen that happen since entity beans with BMP.

> I have seen similar patterns occur when a large set of entities needed
> to be updated or deleted. The whole entity list was simply iterated to
> set a timestamp attribute to the current time and that resulted in a lot
> of update-by-pk statements where the "old" code just did something like
>
> UPDATE abc SET ts = ? WHERE fk=?
>
> The end result in both cases was a couple of hundred updated records but
> the time spent was incomparable.

You can code that right and wrong using JDBC - and you can code that 
right and wrong using ORM.

> I just hope (for your sake) the application code is written quite flat
> on the JPA layer. If some smarty pants has created
> yet-another-intelligent-be-it-redundant-persistence-layer on top of that
> it might be a lot harder to fix things.

????

If the construct is used only once then direct JPA and a layer
will both require on change.

If the construct is used more than once then direct JPA will
require multiple changes and a layer will only require one change.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-02 09:47 +0100
  Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-02 14:23 +0100
    Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 07:52 +0100
      Re: Performance JPA Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-03 11:16 +0000
        Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 19:11 +0100
          Re: Performance JPA Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:15 +0000
            Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 09:28 +0100
              Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-10 08:07 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-10 10:35 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 06:20 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-11 09:32 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 19:56 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 06:50 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-11 12:17 +0000
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-11 09:30 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 23:20 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 23:11 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-11 19:10 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-12 07:27 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-13 08:30 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-13 10:45 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-13 11:06 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-13 13:36 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:04 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-13 21:46 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:09 +0100
          Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:35 -0500
            Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 09:35 +0100
              Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:09 -0500
      Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-03 12:29 +0100
        Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 19:23 +0100
        Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:44 -0500
          Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 09:48 +0100
          Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-04 10:23 +0100
            Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 11:27 +0100
              Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-04 12:42 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:18 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-09 10:43 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:13 +0100
            Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:12 -0500
              Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-09 10:22 +0100
                Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 21:35 -0500
                Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-11 11:29 +0100
      Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:42 -0500
        Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 11:19 +0100
          Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:05 -0500
  Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-02 20:08 -0500
    Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 07:55 +0100
      Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:45 -0500
  Re: Performance JPA Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0800

csiph-web