Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33018
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Performance JPA |
| Date | 2015-11-07 22:05 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n1me60$6d5$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87lhagkcsh.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <563763d9$0$23727$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <87d1vrk20x.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <n1bnpi$2j8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87a8quhxrs.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
On 11/4/2015 5:19 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > On Wednesday 4 Nov 2015 02:42 CET, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> On 11/3/2015 1:52 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >>> As I understood it until now, there should be a little overhead, >>> but it can be worse I understand now. As said in the above >>> rowmapper was used. Now the application uses em.find to read. For >>> displaying a page only reads are done, so using em.find instead >>> rs.get... seems to make a very big difference. Is there a reason >>> for this and can there be something done about this? >> >> If you are retrieving many objects, then you should not be using >> em.find but em.createQuery. > > I think we are doing that. Then em.find should not be the problem. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-02 09:47 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-02 14:23 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 07:52 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-03 11:16 +0000
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 19:11 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:15 +0000
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 09:28 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-10 08:07 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-10 10:35 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 06:20 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-11 09:32 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 19:56 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 06:50 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-11 12:17 +0000
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-11 09:30 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 23:20 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-11 23:11 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-11 19:10 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-12 07:27 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-13 08:30 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-13 10:45 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-13 11:06 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-13 13:36 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:04 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-13 21:46 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:09 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:35 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 09:35 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:09 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-03 12:29 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 19:23 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:44 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 09:48 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-04 10:23 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 11:27 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-04 12:42 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:18 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-09 10:43 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-20 09:13 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:12 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-09 10:22 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 21:35 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-11-11 11:29 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:42 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-04 11:19 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:05 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-02 20:08 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-11-03 07:55 +0100
Re: Performance JPA Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-03 20:45 -0500
Re: Performance JPA Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0800
csiph-web