Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31140
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: ensuring unreachability |
| Date | Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:51:51 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <mc09k1$3se$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnme63vm.uoi.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <statement-20150217115740@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:51:13 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="858a9d65d95f4ea4d355bd116aa2cdbf"; logging-data="3982"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Wcyf32WeAkbFhFr0ye1Mu" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <statement-20150217115740@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:RZr5DB5I81HEQMtu1eOiOaeB0S4= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31140 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2/17/2015 5:58 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>> would recognize it as unreachable and barf. So, I'd like to have some
>> kind of anti-statement, that's ok to be unreachable, but would make the
>
> There is no such statement.
It occurs to me that there is, sort of:
final boolean once;
switch (someEnumVar) {
case E1:
once = true;
if (...) {
...; return;
} else if (...) {
...; throw ...;
} else {
...; continue; // enclosing loop
}
case E2:
once = true; // compiler complains if fall-through possible
...
case E3:
once = true; // ditto
...
}
IMHO, this particular cure is a lot worse than the disease.
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ensuring unreachability Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-02-17 09:54 +0000
Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-17 08:23 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2015-02-17 13:54 -0600
Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-17 15:51 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-02-18 00:40 +0000
Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-18 08:49 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2015-02-18 16:40 +0200
Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-18 10:16 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-18 11:02 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-19 09:48 +0000
Re: ensuring unreachability Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-02-20 09:39 -0800
Re: ensuring unreachability Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-19 09:50 +0000
Re: ensuring unreachability v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2015-02-19 18:20 +0000
Re: ensuring unreachability Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-19 15:24 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-02-19 01:28 +0000
Re: ensuring unreachability Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-02-17 18:49 -0500
Re: ensuring unreachability Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-02-18 00:59 +0000
csiph-web