Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31140

Re: ensuring unreachability

From Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: ensuring unreachability
Date 2015-02-17 15:51 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mc09k1$3se$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <slrnme63vm.uoi.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <statement-20150217115740@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/17/2015 5:58 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>> would recognize it as unreachable and barf. So, I'd like to have some
>> kind of anti-statement, that's ok to be unreachable, but would make the
>
>    There is no such statement.

     It occurs to me that there is, sort of:

	final boolean once;
	switch (someEnumVar) {
	case E1:
	   once = true;
	   if (...) {
	      ...; return;
	   } else if (...) {
	      ...; throw ...;
	   } else {
	      ...; continue; // enclosing loop
	   }
	case E2:
	   once = true; // compiler complains if fall-through possible
	    ...
	case E3:
	   once = true; // ditto
	   ...
	}

IMHO, this particular cure is a lot worse than the disease.

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ensuring unreachability Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-02-17 09:54 +0000
  Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-17 08:23 -0500
  Re: ensuring unreachability Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2015-02-17 13:54 -0600
  Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-17 15:51 -0500
    Re: ensuring unreachability Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-02-18 00:40 +0000
      Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-18 08:49 -0500
        Re: ensuring unreachability Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2015-02-18 16:40 +0200
          Re: ensuring unreachability Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-02-18 10:16 -0500
            Re: ensuring unreachability Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-18 11:02 -0500
              Re: ensuring unreachability Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-19 09:48 +0000
                Re: ensuring unreachability Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-02-20 09:39 -0800
              Re: ensuring unreachability Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-19 09:50 +0000
              Re: ensuring unreachability v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2015-02-19 18:20 +0000
                Re: ensuring unreachability Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-19 15:24 -0500
        Re: ensuring unreachability Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2015-02-19 01:28 +0000
  Re: ensuring unreachability Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-02-17 18:49 -0500
  Re: ensuring unreachability Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-02-18 00:59 +0000

csiph-web