Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30804
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Joshua Cranmer đ§ <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out |
| Date | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:36:37 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <m9rceb$mci$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <s0vtbalf1bbpnt91vd0vp3sd4efvnjdnc7@4ax.com> <8cvtba1g6nkgkcmtv0lbdqj2vmqldbqgk6@4ax.com> <bqvtbalicl6knu89d5togrh9fabe8gna3e@4ax.com> <54c05ce3$0$287$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <qos0catvji0mr8r878cb6b238h9ccimlnp@4ax.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:36:11 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8cedddb29338592f734c41b16a68fadc"; logging-data="22930"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YW2+t8WCv+dPJcHEACMr6PabzlPM7zSM=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <qos0catvji0mr8r878cb6b238h9ccimlnp@4ax.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:w/UIp33yTbrTn9P2KVm3tx1h9Cc= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30804 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 1/21/2015 9:53 PM, Roedy Green wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:13:53 -0500, Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >> Has Oracle used anything besides 1.major.minor_update? > > Lately we have jumps e.g. 1.8.0_25 -> 1.8.0_31 > > We now have a version sometimes labelled 74/75. > > At the most you need XX.YY where XX is a major released with new > features, and YY is a bug fix release. > > So 1.8.0_32 would be 8.32. However stability is more important than > brevity. <http://semver.org/> is the emerging standard for versioning. In short: X.y.z-w An increase in X indicates a backwards-incompatible change. Code that compiles with, e.g., 1.4.0 will not necessarily compile with 2.4.0 An increase in Y indicates a major, but backwards-compatible change. Code that compiles with 1.4.0 will compile with 2.0.0, but not necessarily vice versa. An increase in Z is a "bugfix" update: code that compiles with 1.4.1 will work with 1.4.0. The w qualifier is extra gunk that may be needed for build processes or prerelease. As Java is unlikely to ever break backwards compatibility, that first digit is probably going to stay 1 forever. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-20 17:10 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-20 17:16 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-20 17:24 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-21 21:13 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-21 19:53 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Joshua Cranmer đ§ <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-01-22 11:36 -0600
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-01-22 21:23 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-26 21:23 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-01-27 11:00 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-24 21:27 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-01-24 22:07 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-24 22:21 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-26 21:29 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-01-27 08:58 +0100
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-02-01 09:43 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2015-01-25 11:39 +0200
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2015-01-25 20:56 +0200
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-26 21:25 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-02-01 09:35 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-21 21:16 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-21 21:22 -0500
csiph-web