Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30846
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out |
| Date | 2015-01-24 22:07 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ma1mjt$keg$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <8cvtba1g6nkgkcmtv0lbdqj2vmqldbqgk6@4ax.com> <bqvtbalicl6knu89d5togrh9fabe8gna3e@4ax.com> <54c05ce3$0$287$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <qos0catvji0mr8r878cb6b238h9ccimlnp@4ax.com> <54c4549f$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On 1/24/2015 9:27 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>[...]
> If a tool breaks because a part is increased by more
> than 1, then I think that tools has a design flaw.
Would you mind explaining this further? It seems that you're
saying
"If a tool breaks because a part's version increments by 1
that's all right."
"If a tool breaks because a part's version increments by
2,3,4,...,1e100,... that's a design flaw."
I'm sure that's not what you mean -- but what *do* you mean?
--
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
"Don't be afraid of work. Make work afraid of you." -- TLM
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-20 17:10 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-20 17:16 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-20 17:24 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-21 21:13 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-21 19:53 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-01-22 11:36 -0600
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-01-22 21:23 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-26 21:23 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-01-27 11:00 +0000
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-24 21:27 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-01-24 22:07 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-24 22:21 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-26 21:29 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-01-27 08:58 +0100
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-02-01 09:43 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2015-01-25 11:39 +0200
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2015-01-25 20:56 +0200
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2015-01-26 21:25 -0800
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-02-01 09:35 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-21 21:16 -0500
Re: JDK 1.7.0_75 and 1..8.0_31 are out Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-01-21 21:22 -0500
csiph-web