Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30335
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Java ME or SE? |
| Date | Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:37:04 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 30 |
| Message-ID | <m3rlng$tf6$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <om7s5a1ek51gba042p3o8fhtg70lnjddio@4ax.com> <j2jt5al8qhfjans2n77p4tof3gsl7ufpva@4ax.com> <2dj16ahot0c6v296vlnllh7roj9avqebt5@4ax.com> <m3r9u0$p27$1@dont-email.me> <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:37:04 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e5160e2be48f1ea550cf61512446f525"; logging-data="30182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FXWOkVQxNItpa1R1coNy+hiT+ygIvmCM=" |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:im2bH/avkZLXn7l9KOFudbvBRJw= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30335 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:51:48 +0100, Kees Theunissen wrote: > Martin Gregorie wrote: >> A modern C compiler can compile any C program that was written in the >> past, including those using the original K&R syntax. >> >> Same goes for Java compilers. >> >> IIRC the same applies to Fortran compilers. > > The biggest problem with ancient C or Fortran code is probably not the > compiling step but linking against recent -not backwards compatible- > libraries. A lot of old code will not build on modern systems without > modification. > Agreed, but it will compile and writing an adaptor layer to let it call a modern library is probably a lot easier then adapting the old source, particularly if its a large, badly documented program. But with Python and other languages whose compilers aren't backward compatible, you don't have the option of writing an adaptor layer. Instead, you're forced to review/rewrite your source code every time the language spec changes, which is typically every 2 to 5 years for most languages. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 00:58 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-08 09:27 -0800
Re: Java ME or SE? Doug McIntyre <merlyn@dork.geeks.org> - 2014-11-08 16:17 -0600
Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:38 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 15:51 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:42 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-11-08 18:11 -0800
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-09 11:51 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-11-09 12:36 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-09 13:28 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-11-10 10:00 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-11 01:41 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? cl@isbd.net - 2014-11-10 16:48 +0000
[OT] Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 13:57 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-10 21:15 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> - 2014-11-10 23:51 +0100
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-11 00:37 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:11 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:45 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2014-11-11 07:00 +0100
Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-11 09:46 +0000
csiph-web