Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30338
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Java ME or SE? |
| Date | 2014-11-11 07:00 +0100 |
| Organization | Me, Myself and I |
| Message-ID | <98l8jb-7o.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> (permalink) |
| References | <om7s5a1ek51gba042p3o8fhtg70lnjddio@4ax.com> <2dj16ahot0c6v296vlnllh7roj9avqebt5@4ax.com> <m3r9u0$p27$1@dont-email.me> <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> wrote: >Martin Gregorie wrote: >> A modern C compiler can compile any C program that was written in >> the past, including those using the original K&R syntax. >> >> Same goes for Java compilers. >> >> IIRC the same applies to Fortran compilers. > >The biggest problem with ancient C or Fortran code is probably not the >compiling step but linking against recent -not backwards compatible- >libraries. A lot of old code will not build on modern systems without >modification. You can usually fix that with some switches. All the c code I wrote in the 1980s compile, link and rund Just Fine on modern Linux, BSD and even QNX/Posix systems. Even the Fortran code I entered for the 1130 on punched cards in the 1970s will run with some slight preambles in the code. -- mrr
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 00:58 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-08 09:27 -0800
Re: Java ME or SE? Doug McIntyre <merlyn@dork.geeks.org> - 2014-11-08 16:17 -0600
Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:38 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 15:51 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:42 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-11-08 18:11 -0800
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-09 11:51 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-11-09 12:36 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-09 13:28 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-11-10 10:00 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-11 01:41 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? cl@isbd.net - 2014-11-10 16:48 +0000
[OT] Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 13:57 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-10 21:15 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> - 2014-11-10 23:51 +0100
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-11 00:37 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:11 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:45 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2014-11-11 07:00 +0100
Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-11 09:46 +0000
csiph-web