Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30239
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: redesign exception |
| Date | 2014-10-29 22:05 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m2roc1$vlt$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <cbbjkiFjvvcU1@mid.individual.net> <m2qics$d01$1@dont-email.me> <m2r654$j6g$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m2r85a$t4j$1@dont-email.me> <cbco8kFtjp7U1@mid.individual.net> |
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:59:47 +0100, Robert Klemme wrote: > On 29.10.2014 18:29, Martin Gregorie wrote: > >> I believe a good case can be made that invalid data isn't really an >> Exception because having both good and bad data input is part of normal >> processing and therefore something like a boolean VALID/INVALID return >> from the checking method is alll that's needed. Throwing exceptions >> should be reserved for processing errors, e.g. a public holiday check >> on an in-range future date discovering that the valid public holiday >> list doesn't cover all permitted future dates, or finding that the >> input represents a security violation serious enough to require >> attention from somebody other than the user who input it. > > We could discuss quite a bit about this... If the interfacing code does > not ensure valid input is passed on than it is totally appropriate for > lower layers of code to flag this as a processing error (usually via a > RuntimeException like InvalidArgumentException or NPE). A checking > method with a boolean (or more sophisticated) return value can only ever > be a useful helper but the code receiving data still needs to throw if > the contract is violated. There is really no other way. > Sure. I was only talking about parts of a program where invalid data should be expected as a normal part of the data stream, for instance around input validation methods that sit behind an input screen, which are going to recycle bad input by telling the user what's wrong with his input and inviting corrected data to be supplied. You do the same with incoming mail. An invalid recipient address isn't really exceptional: you get them all the time and spit them back whence they came with a 5xx SMTP error, meanwhile passing clean input on to the archiving and delivery systems. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-25 19:16 -0700
Re: redesign exception Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-10-26 08:09 +0100
Re: redesign exception rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2014-10-26 09:15 +0000
Re: redesign exception Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-10-26 10:36 +0100
Re: redesign exception Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-10-26 09:23 -0400
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 12:56 -0700
Re: redesign exception Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-10-26 18:10 -0400
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 17:39 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 12:06 -0700
Re: redesign exception Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-10-26 20:41 +0100
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 12:46 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 13:12 -0700
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-26 16:50 -0500
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 17:21 -0700
Re: redesign exception Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-10-27 01:05 +0000
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 19:38 -0700
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-27 00:13 -0500
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-27 04:59 -0700
Re: redesign exception Marketa Jadalova <m-jadalova3@gmail.com> - 2014-10-27 16:55 +0000
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-27 12:46 -0500
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-27 15:48 -0700
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-27 22:16 -0500
Re: redesign exception Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-10-27 23:54 +0100
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-27 17:20 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-28 07:12 -0700
Re: redesign exception Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-10-29 08:34 +0100
Re: redesign exception Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-10-29 11:17 +0000
Re: redesign exception Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-29 15:33 +0100
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-29 11:35 -0500
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-29 17:51 -0700
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-29 20:45 -0500
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-30 04:12 -0700
Re: redesign exception Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-30 12:38 +0100
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-30 06:23 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-29 17:01 -0700
Re: redesign exception Marketa Jadalova <m-jadalova3@gmail.com> - 2014-10-29 16:55 +0000
Re: redesign exception Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-10-29 17:29 +0000
Re: redesign exception Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-10-29 18:59 +0100
Re: redesign exception Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-10-29 22:05 +0000
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-29 18:04 -0700
Re: redesign exception Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@huldreskog.localdomain> - 2014-10-29 20:56 -0500
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-30 04:19 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-30 04:27 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-30 04:35 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-29 18:01 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-29 17:00 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-29 16:56 -0700
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-26 12:52 -0700
Re: redesign exception Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-27 09:03 +0100
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-27 05:06 -0700
Re: redesign exception Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-27 13:32 +0100
Re: redesign exception boxzou@gmail.com - 2014-10-27 07:01 -0700
csiph-web