Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30151

Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From ĵess stone <j3ss.st0n3@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy?
Date Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 14
Message-ID <m27j69$rbq$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <a5c0624a-b6a1-4f87-8bb8-824e0db5a029@googlegroups.com> <6fad51bf-bfcd-4dea-839b-b1397b5cb50d@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lQA7rOFasboES0+IO4savg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30151

Show key headers only | View raw


In article 6fad51bf-bfcd-4dea-839b-b1397b5cb50d@googlegroups.com, Saxo
said...

> Well, Jetbrains has a very good plugin for Kotlin for their own IDE
> IntelliJ. They have uploaded a basic eclipse plugin to Gihub. But it is
> clear that their own IDE will always be the most polished one.
> 
> So this looks like Kotlin might become a proprietary language like
> earlier Delphi from Borland. Scala is so screwed up, it makes me sick to
> look at that language. Simply too many bad decisions.

Well, then, I guess that only leaves ... what was that other language? 
Clojure? Assuming that that is non-proprietary and sure to remain that 
way.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-16 05:27 -0700
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-10-16 21:15 +0200
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-10-16 16:28 -0400
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-10-16 19:13 -0400
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-17 06:34 -0700
    Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-10-18 22:42 -0400
      Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-19 11:00 -0700
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-10-19 11:03 -0700
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-21 05:48 -0700
    Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? ĵess stone <j3ss.st0n3@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 06:34 +0000
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-21 15:10 +0200
    Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-21 07:09 -0700
      Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-21 16:26 +0200
        Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-21 08:03 -0700
    Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-22 07:22 -0700
      Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-22 17:14 +0200
        Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-23 08:53 -0700
          Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-24 00:37 +0200
  Re: Alternative languages on the JVM: what's a meaningful strategy? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2014-10-24 02:52 -0700

csiph-web