Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27849

Re: JDK 8 is there

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDK 8 is there
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:58:18 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 10
Message-ID <lgs92n$v63$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <JDK-8-20140318234830@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <quuhi9p4ni256behe2ec9rhakk0q9oc3sj@4ax.com> <q%9Wu.67353$Bm2.20516@fx29.iad> <1loii9l0salejkudl9s9oaa2lcderlpcpe@4ax.com> <zl6Yu.81489$tD4.22859@fx25.iad> <v8p2j9tmasbvsio6nagbue8ub6bbt8s1le@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="aba33539224e5c782fe0c4053f7756fd"; logging-data="31939"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+M8wgbUQBoxsdOi23Er+rC"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
In-Reply-To <v8p2j9tmasbvsio6nagbue8ub6bbt8s1le@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:6bno2mN9YBarIIu1D8xbzd2PYYs=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:27849

Show key headers only | View raw

On 3/25/2014 04:18, Roedy Green wrote:
> I was under the delusion you needed a 32 bit JVM for the browser.

I think you do.  I'm using Win 8.1.  I removed all of Java 7 and 
installed 8 with no difficulties.  I did install 32bit as well for 
Firefox.  It works more or less.

-- 

Knute Johnson

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:09 -0700
  Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-18 22:11 -0400
  Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-18 19:49 -0700
  Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-19 01:34 -0400
    Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-19 02:27 -0700
      Re: JDK 8 is there lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-03-19 20:30 +0000
        Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-24 21:38 -0400
      Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-24 23:02 -0400
        Re: JDK 8 is there Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-03-25 04:18 -0700
          Re: JDK 8 is there Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-03-25 08:58 -0700
            Re: JDK 8 is there Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-03-25 13:33 -0400
            Re: JDK 8 is there Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-03-25 18:26 -0400

csiph-web