Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27514
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 |
| Date | Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:28:08 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 11 |
| Message-ID | <ldnj07$mtv$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <29a51a94-8f9a-41b1-980f-e8c13e2d11a2@googlegroups.com> <ldnitt$mtv$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net Pq2+M4AeIMncfpfrOBkg/pWKwPqvIBD+No7rQgVk7FBRfZu243RFV2F730oXKwpWbJC0M5e0+7FW4uzsFp7Y1g== |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:28:07 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="5AdHPS/asWCXohwTisCjAGkgtgttlSI4AE6ozPoHBfqVm66QlLoMkkLXb8ngjPGdVlDIXPSIB1aVw7mYSfWRkw++UhtwqrCEXxIfU8n242hmCokrpV6ZdcVAC8uNv7qS"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24 |
| In-Reply-To | <ldnitt$mtv$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:KmkT4st5WaY6aOjVk2dfLjib8oM= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:27514 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Jan Burse schrieb: > I found that JDK 8 is more speedier than JDK 7, around 5% > better, which is nice. But my testing might not be > representative: But I somehow have the feeling that the JIT is slower. It took me more iteration until I had a warm run, where all the JIT has kicked in. Bye
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Dennis Haupt <d.haupt82@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 03:00 -0800
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-15 12:26 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-15 12:28 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-15 12:52 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-16 13:10 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 14:38 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 14:43 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-16 14:53 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 20:27 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 20:36 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-17 18:55 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 20:52 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-03-03 11:53 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-03-03 17:16 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-03-03 19:53 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 13:44 -0800
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-16 11:24 -0800
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-15 12:55 +0100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 23:42 +1100
Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-02-16 00:25 -0800
csiph-web