Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27678

Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7

Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Date 2014-03-03 13:44 -0800
References (8 earlier) <ldr3vk$n4h$1@news.albasani.net> <bmf0noFpsoqU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.2d7daa55f1e6c2a8b@202.177.16.121> <lf1mvk$iho$1@news.albasani.net> <lke298guvu4z.12emsy2hy4q19$.dlg@40tude.net>
Message-ID <4f95797f-a7fb-43d5-8fb1-e249b3c77575@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7
From Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, March 3, 2014 8:16:21 AM UTC-8, Joerg Meier wrote:
> private final Object $LOCK = new Object();

That violates the coding conventions in both the Coding Conventions document and the JLS:

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-3.html#jls-3.8 
"The $ character should be used only in mechanically generated source code or, 
rarely, to access pre-existing names on legacy systems."

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/codeconventions-135099.html#367 
"Variable names should not start with underscore _ or dollar sign $ characters, 
even though both are allowed."

-- 
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Dennis Haupt <d.haupt82@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 03:00 -0800
  Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-15 12:26 +0100
    Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-15 12:28 +0100
    Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-15 12:52 +0100
      Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-16 13:10 +0100
        Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 14:38 +0100
          Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 14:43 +0100
            Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-16 14:53 +0100
              Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 20:27 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-02-16 20:36 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-17 18:55 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-02 20:52 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-03-03 11:53 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-03-03 17:16 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-03-03 19:53 +0100
                Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 13:44 -0800
      Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-02-16 11:24 -0800
  Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-15 12:55 +0100
  Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-02-15 23:42 +1100
  Re: java8 up to 6x slower than java7 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-02-16 00:25 -0800

csiph-web