Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24600
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: multiple inheritance in Java |
| Date | 2013-07-02 16:28 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kqvcng$2fn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <kqtjfn$uf0$1@dont-email.me> <kqv1ig$us3$1@dont-email.me> <kqv30m$7sg$1@dont-email.me> <kqv5oi$npg$1@dont-email.me> <kqva89$j5o$1@dont-email.me> |
On 07/02/2013 03:44 PM, Eric Sosman wrote: > On 7/2/2013 2:29 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >> On 07/02/2013 01:40 PM, Eric Sosman wrote: >>> On 7/2/2013 1:17 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >>>> On 07/02/2013 12:09 AM, Eric Sosman wrote: >>>>> Okay. It might have been clearer if you'd chosen names that >>>>> weren't already taken -- although, one must admit, that's not easy >>>>> to do with Java's ever-growing namespace bloat. (Factoid: The HTML >>>>> *index* for the 7.0 API occupies eighteen meg!) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Java never throws anything away. I wonder about a compatibility layer. >>>> rt.jar would contain all of the current stuff, rtc.jar the old. >>> >>> Not sure what the separation would accomplish. All the >>> package names would remain unchanged, all the class and method >>> and field names would remain unchanged, the JavaDoc would still >>> have to describe them all, and the JVM would need to open one >>> more file than it already does. >> >> If someone wanted to expend the effort to do the pruning >> the following would compile with the compatibility switch on >> otherwise throw ClassNotFoundException. >> >> Vector<String> v; >> JList<String> l = new JList<String>(v); >> >> I could download JDK9 or JDK9C, I guess only JDK9C compiler >> would include the -compatibility switch. > > Oh, now I get it. I hadn't realized that you meant the > "compatibility layer" to be unavailable unless specifically > requested. But I think that's a non-starter: Look at all the > "current" classes that still use "old" stuff. Vector, to take > your example, is required by the Swing classes ButtonGroup, > DefaultComboBoxModel, JComboBox, JList, JTable, and JTree, > and perhaps others. (Wisecracks about moving all of Swing to > "old" will be punished with great severity. :) > Known uses of Vector: <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/class-use/Vector.html> I don't mean to suggest throwing the baby out with the bath water. We could have a new 'old' API sans the grime, but I guess it's a "non-starter" because noone wants to pay the price for a cleaner Java Standard Library.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-01 21:52 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 00:09 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 08:13 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:33 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2013-07-05 08:04 +0200
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 13:17 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 13:40 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 14:29 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 15:12 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:23 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:25 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 15:44 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 16:28 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 16:44 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 17:13 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 22:12 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 11:53 -0700
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-07-03 10:46 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-03 13:01 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-07-03 14:12 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-03 14:49 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-06 22:19 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:36 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-07-05 11:01 -0700
csiph-web