Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24595
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: multiple inheritance in Java |
| Date | 2013-07-02 15:12 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kqv88q$7cn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <multiple-inheritence-20130702041514@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <kqtjfn$uf0$1@dont-email.me> <kqv1ig$us3$1@dont-email.me> <kqv30m$7sg$1@dont-email.me> <kqv5oi$npg$1@dont-email.me> |
On 07/02/2013 02:29 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: > On 07/02/2013 01:40 PM, Eric Sosman wrote: >> On 7/2/2013 1:17 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >>> On 07/02/2013 12:09 AM, Eric Sosman wrote: >>>> Okay. It might have been clearer if you'd chosen names that >>>> weren't already taken -- although, one must admit, that's not easy >>>> to do with Java's ever-growing namespace bloat. (Factoid: The HTML >>>> *index* for the 7.0 API occupies eighteen meg!) >>>> >>> >>> Java never throws anything away. I wonder about a compatibility layer. >>> rt.jar would contain all of the current stuff, rtc.jar the old. >> >> Not sure what the separation would accomplish. All the >> package names would remain unchanged, all the class and method >> and field names would remain unchanged, the JavaDoc would still >> have to describe them all, and the JVM would need to open one >> more file than it already does. > > If someone wanted to expend the effort to do the pruning > the following would compile with the compatibility switch on > otherwise throw ClassNotFoundException. I meant to say fail to compile here > > Vector<String> v; > JList<String> l = new JList<String>(v); > > I could download JDK9 or JDK9C, I guess only JDK9C compiler > would include the -compatibility switch. > So now each new release has a compatibility distribution in addition to the version release distribution. A JSR would be attached to each new version to determine the prunings and of course the physical pruning must be done. If we want to maintain the status quo of backward compatibility for evermore along with introduction of new features then we will also want to accept the bloat.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-01 21:52 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 00:09 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 08:13 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:33 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2013-07-05 08:04 +0200
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 13:17 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 13:40 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 14:29 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 15:12 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:23 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:25 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 15:44 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 16:28 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 16:44 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-07-02 17:13 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-07-02 22:12 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-02 11:53 -0700
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-07-03 10:46 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-03 13:01 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-07-03 14:12 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-07-03 14:49 +0100
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-06 22:19 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-04 17:36 -0400
Re: multiple inheritance in Java Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-07-05 11:01 -0700
csiph-web