Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24998
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-15 06:51 -0700 |
| References | (4 earlier) <b6vilcF4judU1@mid.individual.net> <5f47910f-5450-4578-818c-cac2d4b6f436@googlegroups.com> <39a5e684-7cf8-4f00-ba3b-7e280b19d669@googlegroups.com> <b343ce47-aeff-408b-943e-9bba4b280504@googlegroups.com> <kuhdak$l7h$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <df4c28d9-44c5-4676-a19e-5e588d12c120@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? |
| From | taqmcg@gmail.com |
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 10:10:23 PM UTC-4, markspace wrote:
> On 8/14/2013 8:55 AM, taqmcg@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> > The cooperative Thread.interrupt() approach implies that the code
> > that might be interrupted knows about this, i.e., the worker code is
> > aware that there is some monitor. It needs to periodically check
> > the interrupt flag and do something. This couples the invoker to the
> > invoked in a way that's a bit unattractive.
>
> Several low level APIs in Java check for the interrupt flag, so if your
> library is calling these methods, it will check for interrupts implicitly.
> Object.wait(), Thread.sleep(), most of the IO library, probably some
> more which I don't recall at the moment.
>
> Also, if you're going to be dealing with threads at all, get yourself a
> copy of Java Concurrency in Practice. It's *the* state of the art for
> working with threads in Java.
>
> I'll also link to this article by its author:
>
>
>
> <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05236/index.html>
>
It's an interesting article, but I think it tends to undercut your thesis that the check for interrupt in some basic calls [I don't think most normal I/O calls are included though, just some NIO ones] means that we don't need to couple the monitoring code and the worker thread. Since InterruptedException is a declared exception, we need to either declare it in any method that calls these, or we need to handle it in some way -- that's what Goetz is basically talking about. If you want to handle thread interrupts then you will often need to do more than swallow the interrupted exception. Just for grins, if we consider your worker thread as having three lines of code try, wait and catch, 66% of the worker code had to deal with handling the interrupt -- not especially decoupled.
>
> OTOH hand if your library never makes any calls that do check for the
> interrupt flag, well I'm pretty sure there's no chance of this working.
> I'd still really prefer you find a way to make it work though; you're
> spending a lot of time here to implement something that is fundamentally
> broken (i.e., Thread.stop()).
Which brings us back to my original question: In what way is it 'fundamentally' broken? That suggests that there is something inherently unsafe and unfixable in all circumstances not just dangerous and easily misused.
Your right though that I need to get the book...
Regards,
Tom McGlynn
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-07-31 06:36 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-07-31 18:31 +0200
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-07-31 12:35 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-07-31 14:13 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? usvirtualobservatory@gmail.com - 2013-08-01 07:38 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-08-01 14:07 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-08-01 23:15 +0100
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-01 16:16 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-08-02 18:35 +0100
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-08-03 19:21 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-08-02 21:58 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-03 05:08 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-07-31 21:09 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? usvirtualobservatory@gmail.com - 2013-08-01 08:00 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-08-01 11:25 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-08-01 11:49 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-08-02 21:51 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-01 09:30 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-08-01 10:01 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-08-02 21:55 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Sven Köhler <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com> - 2013-08-01 18:28 +0300
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-08-02 18:50 +0100
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-02 11:34 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-08-02 22:04 -0400
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-08-03 10:10 +0100
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-08-03 10:28 +0100
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-03 05:00 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2013-08-11 17:46 +0000
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-13 11:47 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 20:18 +0000
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-08-13 13:51 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2013-08-14 22:42 +0000
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-13 14:10 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 15:22 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arivald <NOSPAMarivald@interia.pl> - 2013-08-14 01:08 +0200
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-08-13 16:45 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Arivald <NOSPAMarivald@interia.pl> - 2013-08-14 08:42 +0200
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-14 09:48 +0200
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-14 08:55 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-08-14 19:10 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-15 06:51 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-08-15 17:35 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-16 06:30 -0700
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2013-08-14 22:43 +0000
Re: What is so bad aboud Thread.stop() ? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-08-15 12:12 -0700
csiph-web