Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30342
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.fr7!fx02.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> |
| Subject | Re: Java ME or SE? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| References | <om7s5a1ek51gba042p3o8fhtg70lnjddio@4ax.com> <2dj16ahot0c6v296vlnllh7roj9avqebt5@4ax.com> <m3r9u0$p27$1@dont-email.me> <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <98l8jb-7o.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 41 |
| Message-ID | <CVk8w.690679$3F6.411440@fx02.am4> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.9.78.47 |
| X-Complaints-To | http://netreport.virginmedia.com |
| X-Trace | 1415699170 82.9.78.47 (Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:46:10 UTC) |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:46:10 UTC |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:46:10 GMT |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3204259543 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2425 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30342 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:00:09 +0100, Morten Reistad wrote: > In article <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>, > Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> wrote: >>Martin Gregorie wrote: >>> A modern C compiler can compile any C program that was written in the >>> past, including those using the original K&R syntax. >>> >>> Same goes for Java compilers. >>> >>> IIRC the same applies to Fortran compilers. >> >>The biggest problem with ancient C or Fortran code is probably not the >>compiling step but linking against recent -not backwards compatible- >>libraries. A lot of old code will not build on modern systems without >>modification. > > You can usually fix that with some switches. All the c code I wrote in > the 1980s compile, link and rund Just Fine on modern Linux, BSD and even > QNX/Posix systems. > > Even the Fortran code I entered for the 1130 on punched cards in the > 1970s will run with some slight preambles in the code. > > -- mrr Python 2.x code run a python 2.x interpreter. seeing as both 2.78 & 3.0 are available for windows & moth Linux's come with V2.7 as the default system python I don't see this a fundamentally difficult option. if you have a large 2.x code base then you should probably stick with it anyway, Reserving 3.0 for "Green Field" projects. -- No character, however upright, is a match for constantly reiterated attacks, however false. -- Alexander Hamilton
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 00:58 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-08 09:27 -0800
Re: Java ME or SE? Doug McIntyre <merlyn@dork.geeks.org> - 2014-11-08 16:17 -0600
Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:38 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 15:51 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:42 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-11-08 18:11 -0800
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-09 11:51 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-11-09 12:36 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-09 13:28 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-11-10 10:00 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-11 01:41 +1100
Re: Java ME or SE? cl@isbd.net - 2014-11-10 16:48 +0000
[OT] Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 13:57 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-10 21:15 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> - 2014-11-10 23:51 +0100
Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-11 00:37 +0000
Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:11 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:45 -0500
Re: Java ME or SE? Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2014-11-11 07:00 +0100
Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-11 09:46 +0000
csiph-web