Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30338

Re: Java ME or SE?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Morten Reistad <first@last.name>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject	Re: Java ME or SE?
Date	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:00:09 +0100
Organization	Me, Myself and I
Lines	23
Message-ID	<98l8jb-7o.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> (permalink)
References	<om7s5a1ek51gba042p3o8fhtg70lnjddio@4ax.com> <2dj16ahot0c6v296vlnllh7roj9avqebt5@4ax.com> <m3r9u0$p27$1@dont-email.me> <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d025586610e07d3d781c78d7c55c62e7"; logging-data="12326"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IF4N6RAhO30tYIJiXbP4317QfkMw8I0U="
Originator	mrr@sambook.reistad.name (Morten Reistad)
X-Newsreader	trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:6E5yEZK2KMhw2WQ+FETfgUgjfKw=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:30338

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

In article <54614184$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Kees Theunissen  <theuniss@rijnh.nl> wrote:
>Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> A modern C compiler can compile any C program that was written in
>> the past, including those using the original K&R syntax.
>>
>> Same goes for Java compilers.
>>
>> IIRC the same applies to Fortran compilers.
>
>The biggest problem with ancient C or Fortran code is probably not the
>compiling step but linking against recent -not backwards compatible-
>libraries. A lot of old code will not build on modern systems without
>modification.

You can usually fix that with some switches. All the c code I wrote
in the 1980s compile, link and rund Just Fine on modern Linux, BSD and
even QNX/Posix systems. 

Even the Fortran code I entered for the 1130 on punched cards in
the 1970s will run with some slight preambles in the code.

-- mrr

Thread

Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 00:58 +1100
  Re: Java ME or SE? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-11-08 09:27 -0800
  Re: Java ME or SE? Doug McIntyre <merlyn@dork.geeks.org> - 2014-11-08 16:17 -0600
    Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:38 -0500
      Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-09 15:51 +1100
  Re: Java ME or SE? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-11-08 17:42 -0500
  Re: Java ME or SE? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-11-08 18:11 -0800
    Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-09 11:51 +0000
    Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-11-09 12:36 +0000
      Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-09 13:28 +0000
        Re: Java ME or SE? stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-11-10 10:00 +0000
    Re: Java ME or SE? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2014-11-11 01:41 +1100
      Re: Java ME or SE? cl@isbd.net - 2014-11-10 16:48 +0000
        [OT] Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 13:57 -0500
      Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-10 21:15 +0000
        Re: Java ME or SE? Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> - 2014-11-10 23:51 +0100
          Re: Java ME or SE? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-11-11 00:37 +0000
            Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:11 -0500
              Re: Java ME or SE? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-10 20:45 -0500
          Re: Java ME or SE? Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2014-11-11 07:00 +0100
            Re: Java ME or SE? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-11-11 09:46 +0000

csiph-web