Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37562

Re: Java 9 issues

Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	2017-10-05 06:10 -0700
References	(8 earlier) <or0rs6$jel$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> <4656bf2d-d22d-46d1-bf82-970c1075a1ba@googlegroups.com> <or17ec$1vpn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <6748a626-2e2c-4b14-a592-4a9ebecd818e@googlegroups.com> <or3sur$imj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID	<31b09684-93a1-4bd7-9d34-8be81086a6be@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Java 9 issues
From	Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 8:04:55 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> PCX was a common format on DOS in the late 80's and early 90's.
> 
> PNM is a common name for PPM+PGM+PBM and I believe it was common on Unix
> in the same timeframe.
> 
> I very much doubt that you use those.
> 
> RAW is used in cameras.
> 
> But unless you are in a camera specific context then I will guess
> that any raw images has been converted to JPEG or TIFF before you
> get them.
> 
> Arne

So yeah it would be nice to have support for them, but unlikely we'll need it.

Thread

Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 08:12 -0700
  Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 11:33 -0400
  Re: Java 9 issues Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2017-10-03 17:43 +0200
    Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 12:07 -0400
      Re: Java 9 issues Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2017-10-03 11:20 -0500
      Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 10:19 -0700
        Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 14:10 -0400
          Re: Java 9 issues Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2017-10-03 20:20 +0200
            Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 15:37 -0400
              Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 12:52 -0700
                Re: Java 9 issues Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2017-10-03 22:27 +0200
                Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 13:38 -0700
                Re: Java 9 issues Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2017-10-03 22:55 +0200
                Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 19:45 -0400
                Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-04 05:18 -0700
                Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-04 20:04 -0400
                Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-05 06:10 -0700
                Re: Java 9 issues Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-10-05 11:06 +0000
                Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-05 06:09 -0700
                Re: Java 9 issues Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-10-05 18:23 +0000
          Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 12:03 -0700
  Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 13:34 -0700
    Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 13:49 -0700
      Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 19:39 -0400
    Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-03 14:01 -0700
    Re: Java 9 issues Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-10-03 17:36 -0400
      Re: Java 9 issues Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-10-04 07:51 -0700
        Re: Java 9 issues Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-10-04 11:20 -0400
          Re: Java 9 issues v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-10-04 20:14 +0000
    Re: Java 9 issues Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-10-03 19:23 -0400

csiph-web