Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
112965 articles (numbers 2337 – 126663) — threaded view
| Advanced| Subject | Author | Date [desc] |
|---|---|---|
| Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 | Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> | 2026-09-22 15:51 -0500 |
| Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 | Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> | 2026-09-22 04:58 -0500 |
| Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 | Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> | 2026-09-22 04:48 -0500 |
| Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2 | Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> | 2026-09-21 18:29 -0500 |
| Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference | Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> | 2026-09-15 17:24 +0800 |
| Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> | 2026-09-14 19:49 +0000 |
| Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference | "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-15 03:16 +0800 |
| Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference | "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> | 2026-09-14 18:34 +0000 |
| Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference | "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-14 22:44 +0800 |
| RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference | Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> | 2026-09-14 18:37 +0800 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-07 16:32 +0800 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-09-07 06:47 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-07 13:24 +0800 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> | 2026-09-07 05:08 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> | 2026-09-07 04:41 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-07 10:48 +0800 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-09-06 22:00 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> | 2026-09-06 19:49 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> | 2026-09-06 19:47 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> | 2026-09-06 18:40 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> | 2026-09-06 17:30 +0000 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-06 23:53 +0800 |
| Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> | 2026-09-06 15:32 +0000 |
| Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra? | "Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-06 23:29 +0800 |
| Re: xkcd: Day Counter | Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> | 2026-09-04 17:49 +0000 |
| Re: xkcd: Day Counter | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-09-04 12:42 +0800 |
| Re: xkcd: Day Counter | Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> | 2026-09-03 17:20 +0000 |
| Re: xkcd: Day Counter | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-08-22 04:14 +0800 |
| Re: xkcd: Day Counter | Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> | 2026-08-21 18:45 +0000 |
| Re: Pro Gauss-Jordan Reduction, Phigs and Phigs+ | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-08-03 02:35 +0800 |
| Pro Gauss-Jordan Reduction, Phigs and Phigs+ (was: Re: Chris M. Thomasson can ask 100 more questions (Re: Tablet and phone UBS-C remote debugging)) | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-08-03 02:27 +0800 |
| Java picky concerning JIT-ing [Luckier with C++/C or FORTRAN compilers?] (Re: I am not in C, it is theory and C++ [Hybrid Approaches from KOAN/Fortran-S]) | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-07-29 12:52 +0200 |
| I am not in C, it is theory and C++ [Hybrid Approaches from KOAN/Fortran-S] | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> | 2026-07-29 12:45 +0200 |
| Graphics Processing with Fortran 77 (was: Re: Your strictness is your problem , not mine) | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> | 2026-07-29 18:10 +0800 |
| Re: Fortran is old enough for the aged penison! | Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> | 2026-06-28 09:58 -0500 |
| Fortran is old enough for the aged penison! | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> | 2026-06-27 11:22 +0200 |
| Re: native gfortran compiler for Windows on arm64 | makendo <makendo@makendo.invalid> | 2026-06-17 14:33 +0800 |
| Re: native gfortran compiler for Windows on arm64 | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-06-17 03:13 +0000 |
| native gfortran compiler for Windows on arm64 | no-no <no-no@no-domain> | 2026-06-16 15:19 -0400 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-06-07 04:26 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | JL <no-user@no-where> | 2026-06-06 20:51 -0400 |
| Rust programmers are 40YO virgins | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> | 2026-06-02 14:20 +0200 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> | 2026-05-03 03:14 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-05-03 02:54 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-05-03 02:53 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> | 2026-05-03 01:01 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> | 2026-05-03 00:52 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-05-02 23:19 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> | 2026-05-02 23:17 +0000 |
| Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released | "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> | 2026-05-02 18:49 +0000 |
csiph-web