Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2)

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2)
Date	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:55:46 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	13
Message-ID	<op.xcob68ohsu5d0p@david> (permalink)
References	<op.xcj1pdntsu5d0p@david> <lfnl3l$7su$1@dont-email.me> <43003c26-3103-4a1e-820a-f633d9196aab@googlegroups.com> <lfphnp$8tc$1@online.de> <22adc819-3a40-4ad8-a3b6-a1c4b89f3ac2@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8c7a470a0c16a8a8641affb1a9a6ce52"; logging-data="24880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WoKc83n/ZCSekYAh3c2NE"
User-Agent	Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:lsZURfNGnjmr2ndTsFVWAV39fsg=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.forth:29038

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:25:31 -0000, Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com>  
wrote:
>
> So, what I'm saying is, we could kill two birds with one stone if we can  
> agree on interpretation semantics for S". Why S" specifically? Because  
> S" is in CORE, so we add more utility/get more bang for the buck by  
> targeting S".

Isn't that exactly what this proposal attempting to do?  Its doing in
FILE rather than CORE, but otherise...

-- 
Peter Knaggs

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2014-03-11 11:18 +0000
  Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-03-11 18:36 +0000
    Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-03-11 21:32 +0100
      Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-03-11 22:38 +0000
        Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-03-12 13:02 +0100
      Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-03-12 04:41 -0500
        Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-03-12 13:16 +0100
    Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 04:33 -0700
      Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-03-12 12:51 +0100
        Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 06:25 -0700
          Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2014-03-12 15:59 +0100
            Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-03-12 19:43 +0100
          Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2014-03-13 18:55 +0000

csiph-web