Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Peter Knaggs" Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: RfD: Interpret S\" (Version 2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:55:46 -0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <43003c26-3103-4a1e-820a-f633d9196aab@googlegroups.com> <22adc819-3a40-4ad8-a3b6-a1c4b89f3ac2@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8c7a470a0c16a8a8641affb1a9a6ce52"; logging-data="24880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WoKc83n/ZCSekYAh3c2NE" User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lsZURfNGnjmr2ndTsFVWAV39fsg= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.forth:29038 On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:25:31 -0000, Mark Wills wrote: > > So, what I'm saying is, we could kill two birds with one stone if we can > agree on interpretation semantics for S". Why S" specifically? Because > S" is in CORE, so we add more utility/get more bang for the buck by > targeting S". Isn't that exactly what this proposal attempting to do? Its doing in FILE rather than CORE, but otherise... -- Peter Knaggs