Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #41945

Re: ? operator in Forth

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: ? operator in Forth
Date Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:30:09 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 22
Message-ID <op.x4r9kjczyfako5@localhost> (permalink)
References <1f86d832-a0bd-4d35-9587-0b81afe11035@googlegroups.com> <4121ada4-218e-4d14-9527-3a3d9bee5185@googlegroups.com> <wIidnTibfrCKYGzInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:41945

Show key headers only | View raw


On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:58:44 -0400, Elizabeth D. Rather <erather@forth.com> wrote:

> The second is better, but still depends on the assumption that you have
> an ITC system and can comma down an xt and it will be executable. In
> some systems, the compiler would generate a jsr at that point, for
> example, even if you turn off the optimizer.

For an ITC system, is there a way to simulate the  *inability*  to
"comma down an xt" of non-ITC systems?

What about other historical ITC behaviors people commonly expect?


I.e., if I need my ITC system to be free from common assumptions
about abilities of Forth words which are  *not*  standardized for
ANS Forth, what words do I redefine and how?


Rod Pemberton

-- 
Just how many texting and calendar apps does humanity need?

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

? operator in Forth Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 13:55 -0700
  Re: ? operator in Forth Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 14:16 -0700
    Re: ? operator in Forth "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-09-10 11:58 -1000
      Re: ? operator in Forth "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 01:30 -0400
        Re: ? operator in Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-09-11 06:17 +0000
    Re: ? operator in Forth julian.fondren@endurance.com - 2015-09-10 21:00 -0700
      Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-10 21:20 -0700
    Re: ? operator in Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-09-11 05:16 +0000
      Re: ? operator in Forth humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 01:11 -0700
        Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-12 17:14 -0700
          Re: ? operator in Forth humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:18 -0700
  Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-10 15:21 -0700
  Re: ? operator in Forth "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 01:35 -0400
  Re: ? operator in Forth humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 22:58 -0700
  Re: ? operator in Forth Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:48 +0200
    Re: ? operator in Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-09-11 16:54 +0000
      Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-11 21:32 -0700
  Re: ? operator in Forth "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 18:13 +0000
    Re: ? operator in Forth "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 18:32 +0000
      Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-14 14:40 -0700

csiph-web