Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #41945
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: ? operator in Forth |
| Date | 2015-09-11 01:30 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <op.x4r9kjczyfako5@localhost> (permalink) |
| References | <1f86d832-a0bd-4d35-9587-0b81afe11035@googlegroups.com> <4121ada4-218e-4d14-9527-3a3d9bee5185@googlegroups.com> <wIidnTibfrCKYGzInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:58:44 -0400, Elizabeth D. Rather <erather@forth.com> wrote: > The second is better, but still depends on the assumption that you have > an ITC system and can comma down an xt and it will be executable. In > some systems, the compiler would generate a jsr at that point, for > example, even if you turn off the optimizer. For an ITC system, is there a way to simulate the *inability* to "comma down an xt" of non-ITC systems? What about other historical ITC behaviors people commonly expect? I.e., if I need my ITC system to be free from common assumptions about abilities of Forth words which are *not* standardized for ANS Forth, what words do I redefine and how? Rod Pemberton -- Just how many texting and calendar apps does humanity need?
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
? operator in Forth Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 13:55 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 14:16 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-09-10 11:58 -1000
Re: ? operator in Forth "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 01:30 -0400
Re: ? operator in Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-09-11 06:17 +0000
Re: ? operator in Forth julian.fondren@endurance.com - 2015-09-10 21:00 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-10 21:20 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-09-11 05:16 +0000
Re: ? operator in Forth humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 01:11 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-12 17:14 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:18 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-10 15:21 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 01:35 -0400
Re: ? operator in Forth humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 22:58 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:48 +0200
Re: ? operator in Forth anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-09-11 16:54 +0000
Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-11 21:32 -0700
Re: ? operator in Forth "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 18:13 +0000
Re: ? operator in Forth "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 18:32 +0000
Re: ? operator in Forth hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-09-14 14:40 -0700
csiph-web