Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #56515

Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup

From Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup
Date 2017-03-31 16:49 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <obminr$da4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <ob14p7$vvp$1@dont-email.me> <ob92mu$ohv$1@dont-email.me> <obme12$tdl$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/31/2017 3:29 PM, rickman wrote:
> On 3/26/2017 2:56 PM, Cecil Bayona wrote:
>>
>> I will tomorrow start looking at the documentation on how to install the
>> software and give it a go, so far noForth is pretty good compared to
>> several other Forth I tried, but meCrisp, and VFX have not been tried
>> and compared.
>
> Have you started your eval of Mecrisp yet?
>
>
>> The comparison weights in many factors such as supported processors,
>> efficiency on how fast it runs and how much resources it takes, how
>> useful is it's Forth implementation, source code availability.
>>
>> No doubt MPE VFX Forth will do well as it can be embedded or it can be
>> tethered to save space, and in tethered mode there is a very nice
>> optimizer built in. The main disadvantage it has an it is an annoying
>> one is that it setup for Flash processors only and there is no sample of
>> it supporting the FRAM parts which are the main parts I'm interested in,
>> so there would be some major work to modify it to work with FRAM parts.
>> It will do well in several aspects, efficiency as it's an optimizing
>> compiler and available in tethered form so only needed works are used,
>> and it has extensive functions, both words available and use of
>> resources such as i2c, spi, SD cards, etc.
>>
>> The whole purpose of the exercise is to make some projects available to
>> others use so I want to pick the right software so others can easily
>> follow. For that reason I will test the free version of MPE instead of
>> the Professional Version.
>
> Do you plan to write a review of each system?  It would be a *very*
> useful web page to have reviews of the various embedded Forth systems so
> others can save a bunch of time when going through the same process.  If
> you simply pick your choice and provide info on that, a lot will be lost
> since others won't have your same preferences and requirements.
>
Sorry some health issues came up and I have no had time to do it, I am 
going out of town this weekend so it will have to wait until next week.

I had not planned a review but I will think about and will have to do 
additional testing then.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 14:42 -0400
  Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 15:37 -0400
  Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 22:37 -0400
    Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2017-03-27 15:27 +0200
      Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:56 -0400
  Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 16:24 -0400
    Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-25 15:33 -0500
      Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 17:23 -0400
        Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-25 17:32 -0500
          Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:09 -0400
            Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 02:50 -0700
              Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 07:56 -0400
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
              Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-26 13:24 -0500
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 14:45 -0400
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-26 14:16 -0500
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-26 14:53 -0500
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 02:16 -0700
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 12:51 -0400
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 12:56 -0400
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-29 12:24 -0500
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-29 12:32 -0500
                Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 14:15 -0400
            Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-26 13:44 -0500
    Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-25 14:42 -0700
      Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup john <anon@example.com> - 2017-05-03 11:30 +0100
  Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-26 13:56 -0500
    Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 16:29 -0400
      Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-31 16:49 -0500
        Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 18:16 -0400
  Re: Mecrisp Forth Startup rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 13:19 -0400

csiph-web