Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135287
| From | "Johann Klasek - swap last two domainparts" <johann+usenet@at.klasek.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Ragsdale Forth assembler history |
| Date | 2026-07-31 11:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd3dp8Fi7fgU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ncvatlFt7ueU1@mid.individual.net> <6a6ac269@news.ausics.net> |
dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30/07/2026 7:50 am, Johann Klasek - swap last two domainparts wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> sometimes ago (2012) I did some re-work on a 65C02 assembler derived >> from the well known Ragsdale Assembler published in c't magazin, >> 1984/01, p. 72, "65C02 Assembler in FORTH". [..] > > Interesting. While I left the 6502 behind long ago, I also had need to upgrade > Cassady's 8080 assembler to Z80 and again to eZ80. I deliberately retained > Intel's mnemonics (with TDL extensions) knowing Zilog's would be an expensive > PITA for no demonstrable gain. Indeed Zilog themselves would have preferred to > use Intel's but fearing legal action, hired a third party to devise a new set: > > https://www.retrotechnology.com/restore/TDLmonitor.html Thank you, I wasn't aware of the TDL extensions at all. It's very interesting to have gotten an overview of the whole thing after just a quick glance. JEEk
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ragsdale Forth assembler history "Johann Klasek - swap last two domainparts" <johann+usenet@at.klasek.invalid> - 2026-07-29 21:50 +0000
Re: Ragsdale Forth assembler history dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 13:18 +1000
Re: Ragsdale Forth assembler history "Johann Klasek - swap last two domainparts" <johann+usenet@at.klasek.invalid> - 2026-07-31 11:04 +0000
csiph-web