Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #28883
| From | C G Montgomery <cgm@physics.utoledo.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress |
| Date | 2014-03-03 17:51 -0500 |
| Organization | the wetware works |
| Message-ID | <lf3123$kiq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <le1212$1t1$1@dont-email.me> <bmjdggFnoniU1@mid.individual.net> <e6c5496c-87de-4ebd-ba4a-74680301df1a@googlegroups.com> <lf1j00$15o$1@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de> <op.xb5tbatj6zenlw@localhost> |
Rod Pemberton dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm wrote: > ... > From what was quoted in JG's post, she didn't grant a license to the > work, > or allow for the work to be licensable. She, at best, granted a right > to 1) make the work available in digital form and 2) make the work > publicly > available on the internet. Of course, publicly available on the > internet > doesn't mean available for free, as everyone here has assumed. A > copyrighted > work in digital form for sale on the internet is "publicly available on > the internet" too ... I.e., it seems the work would still be > copyrighted > in full or almost so, non-licensed, and perhaps have a fee. From what > was posted, she didn't grant anyone here the digital conversion rights > either, i.e., what you need to take her copyright and produce a digital > version. > She said she had "no objection" to the work being available. That > doesn't > mean she gave anyone here the right to convert or distribute. It might > imply that, but then again, it might not. She might have plans to > provide > the book herself. As I see it, she didn't grant any distribution right > either. Re-read it with both a for and against perspective. And, if > all of you are serious about his work being available, I would recommend > to stop being cheap, spend the money, consult a real intellectual > property law attorney, determine what actual rights she actually > granted, if any, > in her full email. Then, get a contract signed by her with all licensed > rights fully enumerated. > The language of Mrs. Noble's statement is essentially what I proposed, deliberately, in my correspondence with her. She is still the copyright owner. She has the legal right to require, at some time in the future, that the digitized copy be removed from the internet, or that it be made available only to those paying some established fee. That is not going to happen. [If it does, sue me. ;-)] I'm in complete agreement with Albert on this one! regards to all cgm
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress C G Montgomery <cgm@physics.utoledo.edu> - 2014-02-18 20:39 -0500
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-19 01:35 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2014-02-19 10:39 +0100
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-19 09:57 +0000
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress jg <josefg@gmail.com> - 2014-02-27 21:07 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2014-02-28 01:26 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Assad Ebrahim <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2014-02-28 14:44 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2014-03-03 10:40 +0100
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 02:36 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-03 13:51 -0500
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-03-03 20:16 +0000
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress C G Montgomery <cgm@physics.utoledo.edu> - 2014-03-03 17:51 -0500
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-03-03 19:09 -0500
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-03 11:28 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 00:08 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress mike73900@gmail.com - 2014-03-04 14:58 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress mike73900@gmail.com - 2014-03-04 16:09 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress "David N. Williams" <williams@umich.edu> - 2014-02-19 08:44 -0500
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Marcos Cruz <null_email_so_use_my_contact_page@programandala.net> - 2014-02-19 19:15 +0000
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-19 11:54 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress mike73900@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 13:56 -0800
Re: J. Noble's Scientific Forth: progress mike73900@gmail.com - 2014-03-03 14:09 -0800
csiph-web