Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #19915
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Double integer input |
| Date | 2013-02-22 18:15 +0100 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Message-ID | <kg893n$u6q$1@online.de> (permalink) |
| References | <dddbd9b1-de8c-4e44-ae90-b67572a1bb53@googlegroups.com> <kg6cg1$a3b$1@speranza.aioe.org> <brWdnQmhLoxDJ7vMnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <kg6fbr$9m5$1@online.de> <2013Feb22.163514@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
Anton Ertl wrote: > And there was a specific occasion that lead to taking out "," in > Gforth: I wrote a priece of code that used "2,", and it compiled fine > but did not work. Eventually I found that Gforth at the time had no > word "2,", but it had "," as double indicator. So it saw a double > literal instead of the word "2,". With Elisabeth's list, "2-" would > be another trap. Yes, but today, 2- is floating point for 2, just like 2+. We didn't take that out, every word that converts to a sensible floating point number with >FLOAT is accepted as input. With our new recognizers, we could implement a <number>+ and <number>- recognizer, which would eliminate that trap, and just compile the literal + and literal - instead (* and / as well). Back then, we didn't have a fontlock mode for Emacs (and Emacs didn't have fontlock at all, and screens didn't have color, at least the ones I had ;-). That would probably have made it easier to debug, if it had correctly highlighted 2, as number. Currently, Gforth has dp-char and fp-char, following MPE, which allows us to switch to MPE mode, which is ',' for doubles and '.' for float. I'm not sure if this is all rigth. My suggestion would be a configuration register for dp and fp sepearators, which is a 32 bit mask for the characters between $20 and $3F. But all that has the global state disadvantage - you need to say which mode you want to be in, when you aren't in standard mode, and when your program is a library, you don't want to disturb the users. You might also have allowed characters and decimal point characters, so e.g. 123'456'789.123'456 is valid, and only the decimal point itself is treated as such. Makes numbers more readable. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Double integer input Rosangela Medeiros da Silva <rosangelamesil@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 18:15 -0800
Re: Double integer input Rosangela Medeiros da Silva <rosangelamesil@gmail.com> - 2013-02-14 02:07 -0800
Re: Double integer input Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-02-14 16:18 +0100
Re: Double integer input Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-02-14 16:27 +0100
Re: Double integer input "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2013-02-14 20:54 +0100
Re: Double integer input Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-02-14 23:20 +0100
Re: Double integer input "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-22 11:00 +1100
Re: Double integer input "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-21 14:24 -1000
Re: Double integer input Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-22 01:50 +0100
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-22 15:35 +0000
Re: Double integer input Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Double integer input stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-02-22 19:02 +0000
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-23 17:27 +0000
Re: Double integer input Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-24 03:42 +0100
Re: Double integer input "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-22 09:08 -1000
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-23 16:15 +0000
Re: Double integer input stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-02-23 17:35 +0000
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-25 15:25 +0000
Re: Double integer input albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-23 19:34 +0000
Re: Double integer input "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotz.cnm> - 2013-02-23 18:35 -0500
Re: Double integer input Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-23 14:58 -0600
Re: Double integer input Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-02-23 22:01 +0100
Re: Double integer input albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-24 04:03 +0000
Re: Double integer input "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-23 18:13 -1000
Re: Double integer input Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-02-24 12:01 +0100
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-25 18:09 +0000
Re: Double integer input rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 15:01 -0500
Re: Double integer input Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-02-25 01:13 +0100
Re: Double integer input Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-02-24 23:44 -0800
Re: Double integer input rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-02-27 07:47 -0500
Re: Double integer input Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-02-24 23:42 -0800
Re: Double integer input Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-25 03:57 -0600
Re: Double integer input albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-02-25 14:09 +0000
Re: Double integer input Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-25 16:45 +0100
Re: Double integer input Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-25 18:26 -0600
Re: Double integer input Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-26 02:04 +0100
Re: Double integer input Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-26 05:10 -0600
Re: Double integer input Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-02-26 15:31 +0100
Re: Double integer input Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-02-26 10:28 -0600
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-25 16:38 +0000
Re: Double integer input rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-02-24 14:54 -0500
Re: Double integer input "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-24 11:59 -1000
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-02-25 18:11 +0000
Re: Double integer input rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-02-27 07:58 -0500
Re: Double integer input anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-02 17:10 +0000
Re: Double integer input "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-02-22 13:22 +1100
Re: Double integer input "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-21 16:31 -1000
Re: Double integer input Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-22 04:54 -0800
Re: Double integer input "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-24 22:05 +0000
Re: Double integer input Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-24 15:02 -0800
Re: Double integer input Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 09:22 -0800
Re: Double integer input Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-02-25 10:21 -0800
Re: Double integer input Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-02-26 07:47 -0800
Re: Double integer input "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-02-28 06:27 +0000
Re: Double integer input Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-02-23 21:34 -0800
Re: Double integer input "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-02-24 08:16 -1000
csiph-web