Re: Should Forth Be Recommended Here?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!poup.poupinou.org!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Should Forth Be Recommended Here?
Date	Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:54:16 +0000
Organization	Hidecs Consultancy
Lines	20
Message-ID	<cedv8pF5jogU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<547db280$0$6898$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> <LfCdnVD5DKD3l-PJnZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <547f0d79$0$15861$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl> <ceaqooFaohkU1@mid.individual.net> <3aWdnSZ1CfWO4xzJnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@saix.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7Bit
X-Trace	individual.net W2I2+ce2m9yzyKoB/h5EeQCNhFQUFXr3e7CDjAH55NLVnTXpc4
Cancel-Lock	sha1:4KEmftdIT5crGQ9YX+bN4E7CPik=
User-Agent	KNode/4.11.4
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.forth:34794

Show key headers only | View raw

Celeros wrote:

> http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/9995/where-do-i-start-learning-about-avionics-programming
> 
> Maybe some of you who have had experience in this field could answer this?

It would seem sensible as his interest is more towards the space end of the 
aerospace industry. Most of the airliners and flying warfare machines will 
use languages like C, Ada and SPARK, and work hard for compliance with 
DO-178b & C, amongst other standards. Spacecraft are more likely to use 
Forth (although not necessarily exclusively).

-- 
********************************************************************
Paul E. Bennett IEng MIET.....<email://Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk>
Forth based HIDECS Consultancy.............<http://www.hidecs.co.uk>
Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972
Tel: +44 (0)1235-510979
Going Forth Safely ..... EBA. www.electric-boat-association.org.uk..
********************************************************************

Thread

A poor mans memoizer. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-02 12:37 +0000
  Re: A poor mans memoizer. the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:37 -0800
  Re: A poor mans memoizer. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-12-02 08:52 -1000
    Re: A poor mans memoizer. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-03 13:17 +0000
      Re: A poor mans memoizer. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-12-03 09:07 -1000
        Re: A poor mans memoizer. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-04 09:08 +0000
          Re: A poor mans memoizer. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-12-04 12:42 -0800
            Re: A poor mans memoizer. stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-12-05 12:18 +0000
        Re: A poor mans memoizer. Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-12-04 03:47 -0800
          Re: A poor mans memoizer. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-12-04 08:43 -1000
      Re: A poor mans memoizer. mhx@iae.nl - 2014-12-03 14:47 -0800
        Re: A poor mans memoizer. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-04 09:31 +0000
          Re: A poor mans memoizer. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-12-04 08:58 -1000
            Re: A poor mans memoizer. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-05 12:11 +0000
              van der Horsts Stallman convention (was: A poor mans memoizer.) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-12-05 12:23 +0000
                Re: van der Horsts Stallman convention "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-12-05 09:01 -1000
                Re: van der Horsts Stallman convention (was: A poor mans memoizer.) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-12-06 10:06 +0000
      Re: A poor mans memoizer. Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-12-04 10:19 +0000
        Should Forth Be Recommended Here? Celeros <kern000@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 11:42 +0200
          Re: Should Forth Be Recommended Here? Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-12-05 14:54 +0000
    Re: A poor mans memoizer. Rob Sciuk <rob@controlq.com> - 2014-12-05 14:08 -0500

csiph-web