Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #33909

Re: ball-hours

From Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design, comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: ball-hours
Date 2014-10-15 05:36 -0700
Message-ID <ca781uF62j7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <5sho3adpfhed897nb8jdju99897ouhrvrv@4ax.com> <ca32quF4676U1@mid.individual.net> <m1i6nl$ssm$1@dont-email.me> <ca5ccgFm6ouU1@mid.individual.net> <m1ksvp$2o4$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


rickman wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 3:37 PM, Joerg wrote:
>> rickman wrote:
>>>
>>> I use a program under Win32Forth to run my test fixture.
>>>
>>
>> I have to go by what talent pool is available and regarding Forth that
>> looks pretty parched. Tomorrow I am going to meet with a new SW
>> contractor. For the upcoming project I need someone local because later
>> we'll have to work together a lot in the lab. Plus if I use my mountain
>> bike I can get there without a car and partially without roads :-)
>>
>> What you usually find locally is C and sometimes assembler. Occasionally
>> people know Basic but then that's about it.
>>
>> It's similar with hardware. Being able to secure local talent is a major
>> factor driving 8051 family designs. Unfortunately I can't do that with
>> the new project because I need a ton more horsepower but first I am
>> going to see what the SW guy is familiar with.
> 
> I was actually talking about you learning a language, but either way.
> 

The only language I'd rally like to learn is Spanish :-)

But seriously, I do not want to get too involved in the actual
programming job because I am fully loaded with analog/mixed projects
already and want to reserve at least a few hours per week for mountain
biking.


> It is funny how in the forth community Forth is considered to be easy to
> learn and very facile for many tasks, especially when you need to
> interact with hardware or anything else where you don't have all the
> details clearly laid out.  But outside that community Forth is treated
> like a three eyed toad.
> 

Problem is, there is no Forth community out here. The last die-hard
Forth aficionado I personally met was about 30 years ago in Europe.


> I seem to recall that you use the 8051 because you want a 20 year
> product life or something like that, right? ...


Not on this project but otherwise, yes. One of my designs containing an
8051 will celebrate its 20th next year. Still in production and no end
in sight. Second source is another concern and you can only get that for
a small selection of 8051 uC.


>   ... Does that affect your talent pool?
> 

For other projects it does. We need to make sure that 10 years down the
road it will be possible to find someone locally who can re-write the
code. With 8051 that's usually not a problem.


> http://www.forth.com/embedded/swiftx-embedded-systems-development-tools.html?MCU=8051
> 
> 
> http://www.mpeforth.com/xc7.htm#f7targets
> 
> From your web page it looks like you are a half hour east of Sacramento,
> California in Cameron Park.
> 

Yep, near Hwy 50 just before Placerville. But the project is already
committed to a local guy if he feels comfortable to do it. Which I
should know by tomorrow. It has to be local in this case.


> I am cross posting to the forth group.  Tell us a few details and we'll
> see if anyone can accommodate your needs.
> 

Can't reveal too many details but from a code point of view essentially
several FFTs, one of them a big one, 1024 point complex (I/Q) every
5msec, overlapping. Extract phase, some complex-conjugate math to
extricate component values every 5msec (sort of a poor man's reverse
network analysis), followed by filtering, some more math or a LUT, then
modulating the result onto an audio carrier. Sprinkled with user
interface handling and calibration routines. Back of the envelope calcs
indicate that this will reasonably fit into a 100MHz ARM but of course
I'd rather have a few more megahoitzes.

-- 
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 00:25 -0400
  Re: ball-hours bruce.person@gmail.com - 2014-10-14 23:51 -0700
    Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 03:15 -0400
  Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-15 05:36 -0700
    Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 16:22 -0400
      Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-15 16:12 -0700
        Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 22:48 -0400
          Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-16 11:21 -0700
            Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 15:24 -0400
              Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-16 13:37 -0700
                Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 17:42 -0400
                Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-17 07:14 -0700
                Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-17 14:03 -0400
                Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-17 12:03 -0700
                Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-17 15:23 -0400
                Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-17 12:44 -0700
                Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-17 18:37 -0400
                Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 20:59 -0400
                Re: ball-hours albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-17 08:43 +0000
                Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-17 13:53 -0400
                Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-17 07:50 -0700
        Re: ball-hours Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 20:42 -0700
          Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 01:50 -0400
            Re: ball-hours Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 00:49 -0700
              Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 05:14 -0400
            Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-16 11:58 -0700
        Re: ball-hours "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-16 08:32 -1000
          Re: ball-hours rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-16 15:32 -0400
          Re: ball-hours Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2014-10-16 13:45 -0700

csiph-web