Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #54982
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? |
| Date | Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:05:20 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 13 |
| Message-ID | <87o9xzm4e7.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink) |
| References | <868fa053-875a-4c87-92fd-edb924ca7efd@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="438961605d72ac5d3c11ac134f5a0e06"; logging-data="11580"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9gVWN44XyTKEeCY5MOSK8" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:A5DripLY56s0/e6+2zCV/GLP4JE= sha1:tOBozaoazchfeNUn61kw0iX5A54= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:54982 |
Show key headers only | View raw
jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> writes: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1615413/Own%20Work/68k2.pdf Is this something you're developing yourself? Why? The 68000 was great in its day, but that approach is now rather old-fashioned. Do not not like RISC-V? What do you mean about "how easy to port"? You mean run Forth on it? Get a Forth-based toolchain going? Or what? Maybe it's because I'm not conversant with FPGA's but I'd say start with a software emulation to get the basic tools working. That will also give you something to test your FPGA against.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 13:44 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-18 16:05 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 16:15 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-18 19:50 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 20:17 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-02-18 17:41 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 19:29 -0800
csiph-web