Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #54982
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? |
| Date | 2017-02-18 16:05 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87o9xzm4e7.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink) |
| References | <868fa053-875a-4c87-92fd-edb924ca7efd@googlegroups.com> |
jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> writes: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1615413/Own%20Work/68k2.pdf Is this something you're developing yourself? Why? The 68000 was great in its day, but that approach is now rather old-fashioned. Do not not like RISC-V? What do you mean about "how easy to port"? You mean run Forth on it? Get a Forth-based toolchain going? Or what? Maybe it's because I'm not conversant with FPGA's but I'd say start with a software emulation to get the basic tools working. That will also give you something to test your FPGA against.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 13:44 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-18 16:05 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 16:15 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-18 19:50 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 20:17 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-02-18 17:41 -0800
Re: How easy to port to this 68000 variant-ish? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 19:29 -0800
csiph-web