Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #43488

Re: rainbowforth ?

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: rainbowforth ?
Date 2015-11-11 19:49 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87k2pnri5k.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <pan.2015.11.12.02.37.46@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Unknown <dog@gmail.com> writes:
> It seems that the forth community mocks colorforth?

I wouldn't say that.  Colorforth went in its own direction but has good
ideas.

> I fetched colorforth, but I don't have W32 access, so I noticed that
> rainbowforth claims to run on linux.
> After compiling, running ./rainbowforth displays a nice 'frame'

Oh interesting, I hadn't heard of Rainbowforth:
   http://rainbowforth.sourceforge.net/
Implementation notes:
  https://github.com/flagxor/rainbowforth/blob/master/web/svfig_jan2008.pdf

The original Colorforth was written in x86 assembler by Chuck Moore, and
ran on a real or emulated PC with no operating system at all.
Rainbowforth is a dialect/reimplementation done by Brad Nelson in C.

> In principle, the mental aid from color-info would allow one to start
> using forth, without first getting-married-to-it.  You'll build
> fluency by usage, like a child learns.  That's cost effective.
> How do I make this baby talk ?

Rainbowforth looks like fun but I'd say you're better off starting out
with a conventional Forth.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

rainbowforth ? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 02:37 +0000
  Re: rainbowforth ? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 19:49 -0800
    Re: rainbowforth ? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 23:46 -0800
    Re: rainbowforth ? WhoCares@gmail.com - 2015-11-26 06:56 +0000
  Re: rainbowforth ? Pablo Hugo Reda <pabloreda@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 02:24 -0800

csiph-web