Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor
Date	Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:04:51 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	14
Message-ID	<8737del198.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References	<a3eeeb1f-985b-4295-be6c-d48bf5a93ac9@googlegroups.com> <ocjsmo$il6$1@dont-email.me> <87bms2lafo.fsf@nightsong.com> <ock6i1$33k$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0de1f87b5972fac17e91256555e4d05f"; logging-data="7653"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FEBqKnu4C3V5IBGUc79Bu"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:177BXDY5N2yIrzztAvoYXLIKsiY= sha1:NGc45aBEwtoT1bo/M4p351FlCSM=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.forth:57094

Show key headers only | View raw

rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm good with VHDL, but I prefer to work from specifications rather
> than trying to divine a spec from poor documentation.  I'm not clear
> on what is available.

The RTX-2000 was space qualified if I'm not confusing it with something
else, so I'd expect it to be documented out the wazoo.  Maybe it's a
matter of finding some manuals for it and working from those.  If it
were me, I'd start with a software emulation.  Ymmv.

Why is the RTX-2000 interesting anyway?  Do people have old code they
want to run on it?  Do they want to write new code for a stack processor
just because it's cool?  If the latter, exact compatibility with the
RTX-2000 isn't as important.  For that matter, there's always the J1.

Thread

who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor "dfnum2@gmail.com" <dfnum3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 11:51 -0700
  Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor mentificium@gmail.com - 2017-04-10 19:04 -0700
  Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-11 10:42 -0700
    Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Clive Arthur <cliveta@nowaytoday.co.uk> - 2017-04-11 19:25 +0100
      Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-12 01:05 -0700
    Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-12 04:18 -0500
      Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-12 11:39 -0700
      Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-13 03:04 -0700
        Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-13 05:41 -0500
  Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 20:37 -0400
    Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 17:46 -0700
      Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 23:25 -0400
        Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 21:04 -0700
          Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 00:31 -0400
          Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-12 07:10 +0200
            Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 22:29 -0700
          Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Clive Arthur <cliveta@nowaytoday.co.uk> - 2017-04-12 08:54 +0100

csiph-web