Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #57115
| From | Clive Arthur <cliveta@nowaytoday.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor |
| Date | 2017-04-12 08:54 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ockmac$phe$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <a3eeeb1f-985b-4295-be6c-d48bf5a93ac9@googlegroups.com> <ocjsmo$il6$1@dont-email.me> <87bms2lafo.fsf@nightsong.com> <ock6i1$33k$1@dont-email.me> <8737del198.fsf@nightsong.com> |
On 12/04/2017 05:04, Paul Rubin wrote: > rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm good with VHDL, but I prefer to work from specifications rather >> than trying to divine a spec from poor documentation. I'm not clear >> on what is available. https://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/hs-r/hs-rtx2010rh.pdf > The RTX-2000 was space qualified if I'm not confusing it with something > else, so I'd expect it to be documented out the wazoo. Maybe it's a > matter of finding some manuals for it and working from those. If it > were me, I'd start with a software emulation. Ymmv. The RTX2010 was the rad-hard version, but pretty similar otherwise. IIRC it had a multiplier and barrel shifter whereas the RTX2000 had just the multiplier. I think both had 256 deep stacks. The RTX2001 was a cheaper version and had neither barrel shifter nor multiplier, and smaller 64 deep stacks. I used that one a lot. > Why is the RTX-2000 interesting anyway? Do people have old code they > want to run on it? Do they want to write new code for a stack processor > just because it's cool? If the latter, exact compatibility with the > RTX-2000 isn't as important. For that matter, there's always the J1. Cheers -- Clive
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor "dfnum2@gmail.com" <dfnum3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 11:51 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor mentificium@gmail.com - 2017-04-10 19:04 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-11 10:42 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Clive Arthur <cliveta@nowaytoday.co.uk> - 2017-04-11 19:25 +0100
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-12 01:05 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-12 04:18 -0500
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-12 11:39 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-04-13 03:04 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-13 05:41 -0500
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 20:37 -0400
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 17:46 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 23:25 -0400
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 21:04 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 00:31 -0400
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-12 07:10 +0200
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 22:29 -0700
Re: who can use a Harris RTX-2000 processor Clive Arthur <cliveta@nowaytoday.co.uk> - 2017-04-12 08:54 +0100
csiph-web