Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.brown.octanews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not?
References	<ab2c43cf-2e71-479a-8fd9-d6f385ff515d@googlegroups.com> <2012Aug31.105444@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <7xharjjswo.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <DoadnZWBv_zmBd3NnZ2dnUVZ8lKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <7x4nnjniub.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <b9idndCGIYrTet3NnZ2dnUVZ8vadnZ2d@supernews.com> <db04c332-6114-44d1-b73f-c75774651997@k3g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <7xwr0ewumv.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <1522870.MZ5L3yMPMu@sunwukong.fritz.box>
Date	Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:41:03 -0700
Message-ID	<7x4nnhqmsg.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink)
Organization	Nightsong/Fort GNOX
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:uFS0glBjuXaQWywYOHVFuBYlizI=
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines	10
NNTP-Posting-Date	01 Sep 2012 19:41:03 CDT
X-Complaints-To	abuse@octanews.net
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.forth:15379

Show key headers only | View raw

Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> writes:
> In Gforth, you probably want something like
>
> 0 Value escape
> : nest-loop ( -- )  0 to escape
>   BEGIN  refill  WHILE  interpret prompt cr escape UNTIL  THEN ;
> : ?? ( -- )  create-input ['] nest-loop catch pop-file throw ;
> : q ( -- )  true to escape ;

Thanks.

Thread

Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-30 11:27 -0700
  Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-30 08:42 -1000
  Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 14:37 -0700
    Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-30 14:26 -1000
      Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 02:25 -0700
        Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-31 08:18 -1000
  Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-30 18:48 -0700
    Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 02:12 -0700
  Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-31 08:54 +0000
    Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 02:46 -0700
      Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-31 05:56 -0500
        Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 09:10 -0700
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-31 11:33 -0500
            Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 12:51 -0700
              Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-31 23:23 +0200
              Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 15:42 -0700
                Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-01 01:52 +0200
                Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-01 17:41 -0700
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 17:54 +0100
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-31 08:22 -1000
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-03 22:15 +1000

csiph-web