Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not?

From	"Ed" <invalid@nospam.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not?
Date	2012-09-03 22:15 +1000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<k226pn$k2l$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<ab2c43cf-2e71-479a-8fd9-d6f385ff515d@googlegroups.com><2012Aug31.105444@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at><7xharjjswo.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com><DoadnZWBv_zmBd3NnZ2dnUVZ8lKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <7x4nnjniub.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Paul Rubin wrote:
> ...
> Is there a way to stop the program execution and give an interactive
> prompt, so that the stacks and dictionary can be inspected, I guess from
> another task?  That would be pretty cool.

Sounds like the BREAK/GO tool described by Leo Brodie in FD :

05  1   Add A Break Point Tool
05  4   Letters: Breakpoint Revisited, Code For All Seasons

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-30 11:27 -0700
  Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-30 08:42 -1000
  Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 14:37 -0700
    Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-30 14:26 -1000
      Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 02:25 -0700
        Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-31 08:18 -1000
  Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-30 18:48 -0700
    Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 02:12 -0700
  Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-08-31 08:54 +0000
    Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 02:46 -0700
      Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-31 05:56 -0500
        Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 09:10 -0700
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-08-31 11:33 -0500
            Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 12:51 -0700
              Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2012-08-31 23:23 +0200
              Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-31 15:42 -0700
                Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-09-01 01:52 +0200
                Re: Single Step Debugging, why or why not? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-01 17:41 -0700
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2012-08-31 17:54 +0100
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-08-31 08:22 -1000
          Re: Single Step Debugging,  why or why not? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-09-03 22:15 +1000

csiph-web