Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #141995 > unrolled thread
| Started by | gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-03-17 14:45 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-03-19 14:58 -0700 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 109 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c
[ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-03-17 14:45 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations nobody@example.org (Scott) - 2019-03-17 17:25 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-17 10:59 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-03-17 14:16 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-03-17 18:43 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-17 22:55 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 01:37 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-17 19:46 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-03-18 08:41 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 11:20 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 04:39 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 12:08 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 05:26 -0700
labels and declarations and debugger breakpoints "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 05:40 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 17:25 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-03-18 19:11 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-19 01:36 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 12:31 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 19:57 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 13:09 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 21:09 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 16:03 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 23:49 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 16:53 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 18:03 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-03-18 13:16 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2019-03-18 12:30 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-03-18 13:41 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 06:54 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 07:05 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 09:07 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-18 06:46 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 07:25 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-03-21 17:48 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-21 10:04 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-21 10:34 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-03-21 20:19 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-21 14:29 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 10:15 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 13:58 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 15:10 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 15:31 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-03-22 09:22 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 09:28 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Manfred <invalid@add.invalid> - 2019-03-22 18:15 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 10:51 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-22 11:31 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-03-23 17:43 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-23 13:36 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-03-23 17:37 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-25 09:18 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-03-22 12:59 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-22 14:03 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-03-23 12:44 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2019-03-24 10:10 -0500
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-03-23 17:48 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-03-25 11:32 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2019-03-21 22:22 -0500
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-03-22 17:45 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-22 11:13 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-03-23 18:20 +0100
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-23 11:57 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2019-03-25 10:58 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-25 13:17 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-17 16:16 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-03-17 19:29 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-17 16:49 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-03-17 19:51 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-17 17:41 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-03-17 22:53 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-03-17 21:08 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-17 21:40 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-03-18 05:03 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 02:30 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-18 06:32 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-03-18 16:06 +0000
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-03-17 22:19 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-03-17 20:07 -0400
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-03-17 12:37 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 11:00 +0800
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 22:43 +0800
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 08:00 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 13:11 +0800
Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-03-19 05:27 +0000
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 14:40 +0800
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 04:39 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 19:44 +0800
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 05:11 -0700
Re: Use of goto in high-level C programming "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 20:13 +0800
Re: Use of goto in high-level C programming fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 05:42 -0700
Re: Use of goto in high-level C programming "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 20:44 +0800
Re: Use of goto in high-level C programming Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2019-03-20 08:16 +0200
Re: Use of goto in high-level C programming "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-20 19:16 +0800
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 05:13 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 05:56 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 06:30 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 06:54 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 07:12 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 12:03 -0700
Re: Telling Fred where to go... (Was: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations) fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 13:33 -0700
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 05:17 -0700
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 20:23 +0800
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 05:40 -0700
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 20:46 +0800
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 06:30 -0700
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 21:36 +0800
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 07:08 -0700
Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2019-03-20 19:16 +0800
Re: [ On topic, amazingtly ]: labels and declarations John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 14:58 -0700
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 05:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <44f3bda5-52d5-45ff-a0b7-29d35a41437e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #141995 |
On Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 7:45:38 AM UTC-7, Kenny McCormack wrote: > Came across something interesting the other day. First of all, for the > purposes of this discussion, assume two things: > 1) You don't have any ideological objection to gotos. > 2) You don't have any ideological objection to C99 style "intermixing". > > So, assume you like to have your declarations as close to the code that > uses hem as possible. So, you write something like: > > ... > goto somelabel; > ... > > > somelabel: > int foo; > (code that uses foo) > > But the compiler says that labels can only be associated with statements > and declarations aren't statements. Makes sense, so you change the label > line to: > > somelabel:; > > and everything is fine. > > Is this the approved fix? Should it be necessary? Is there any reason not > to do this? > > -- > The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 > lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain > in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL: Okay, I have to admit. I had to look up the official definition of a declaration in C in order to follow this thread. My excuse is that I don't use C at my job. This is because writing C programs doesn't get me laid. However, writing Java programs with a flashy lights does. It's the kind of stuff where the women in the both the procurement and finance department go "You're so smart." Then you end up going to a bar after work, and yeah...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 20:23 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <q6qmva$ref$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #142060 |
On 3/19/2019 8:17 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote:
>
> Okay, I have to admit. I had to look up the official definition of a declaration in C in order to follow this thread. My excuse is that I don't use C at my job. This is because writing C programs doesn't get me laid. However, writing Java programs with a flashy lights does. It's the kind of stuff where the women in the both the procurement and finance department go "You're so smart." Then you end up going to a bar after work, and yeah...
>
Mr. Hodgin drifted from C programming to religion
And you drifted from programming, not even C, to sex life.
Well, do you really need Java or C to make you look smart? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
¤£É¶U! ¤£¶BÄF! ¤£½ä¿ú! ¤£´©¥æ! ¤£¥´¥æ! ¤£¥´§T! ¤£¦Û±þ! ¤£¨D¯«!
½Ð¦Ò¼{ºî´© (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 05:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <ac917f7f-d7a5-4789-8b81-b28567b6be4a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #142061 |
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 5:23:16 AM UTC-7, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 3/19/2019 8:17 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote: > > > > Okay, I have to admit. I had to look up the official definition of a declaration in C in order to follow this thread. My excuse is that I don't use C at my job. This is because writing C programs doesn't get me laid. However, writing Java programs with a flashy lights does. It's the kind of stuff where the women in the both the procurement and finance department go "You're so smart." Then you end up going to a bar after work, and yeah... > > > > Mr. Hodgin drifted from C programming to religion > And you drifted from programming, not even C, to sex life. > > Well, do you really need Java or C to make you look smart? :) > Well, I can't speak for C, but according to a few semi confused Ph.D.s, you're "smart" if you know things like late binding in Java. Yes, late binding is a difficult concept to grasp. But it's really not that much worse than dealing pointers in C.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 20:46 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <q6qoa8$3kb$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #142062 |
On 3/19/2019 8:40 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote:
>
> Well, I can't speak for C, but according to a few semi confused Ph.D.s, you're "smart" if you know things like late binding in Java. Yes, late binding is a difficult concept to grasp. But it's really not that much worse than dealing pointers in C.
>
You don't need anything to make you look smart. Just find some foolish
girls, especially slave girls coming from poor families. I believe many
countries have them.... governments rely on slaves to do dirty jobs.
Do you find that ugly? :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
¤£É¶U! ¤£¶BÄF! ¤£½ä¿ú! ¤£´©¥æ! ¤£¥´¥æ! ¤£¥´§T! ¤£¦Û±þ! ¤£¨D¯«!
½Ð¦Ò¼{ºî´© (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 06:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <7ad73e51-0ba0-4b92-a8d5-ee8b64731ca6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #142065 |
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 5:46:07 AM UTC-7, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 3/19/2019 8:40 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote: > > > > Well, I can't speak for C, but according to a few semi confused Ph.D.s, you're "smart" if you know things like late binding in Java. Yes, late binding is a difficult concept to grasp. But it's really not that much worse than dealing pointers in C. > > > > You don't need anything to make you look smart. Just find some foolish > girls, especially slave girls coming from poor families. I believe many > countries have them.... governments rely on slaves to do dirty jobs. > > Do you find that ugly? :) > There are two programmers by me that came from poor families. The one guy's family actually left when he was a kid. He told me if they didn't flee, the military would have killed his dad, raped his mom, and then he would more than likely live as a slave. The other guy shares as similar horror story.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 21:36 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <q6qr92$l44$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #142066 |
On 3/19/2019 9:30 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 5:46:07 AM UTC-7, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>
>> You don't need anything to make you look smart. Just find some foolish
>> girls, especially slave girls coming from poor families. I believe many
>> countries have them.... governments rely on slaves to do dirty jobs.
>>
>> Do you find that ugly? :)
>
> There are two programmers by me that came from poor families. The one guy's family actually left when he was a kid. He told me if they didn't flee, the military would have killed his dad, raped his mom, and then he would more than likely live as a slave. The other guy shares as similar horror story.
>
They could be lying to get a place in your country! Anyway... the world
is always ugly when it came to sex! I am shying away from this kind of
topics. :)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
¤£É¶U! ¤£¶BÄF! ¤£½ä¿ú! ¤£´©¥æ! ¤£¥´¥æ! ¤£¥´§T! ¤£¦Û±þ! ¤£¨D¯«!
½Ð¦Ò¼{ºî´© (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fir is a sexy shemale <cdalten@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 07:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <a2678918-3a20-462e-98e4-2856585a2086@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #142069 |
On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 6:36:42 AM UTC-7, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 3/19/2019 9:30 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 5:46:07 AM UTC-7, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > >> > >> You don't need anything to make you look smart. Just find some foolish > >> girls, especially slave girls coming from poor families. I believe many > >> countries have them.... governments rely on slaves to do dirty jobs. > >> > >> Do you find that ugly? :) > > > > There are two programmers by me that came from poor families. The one guy's family actually left when he was a kid. He told me if they didn't flee, the military would have killed his dad, raped his mom, and then he would more than likely live as a slave. The other guy shares as similar horror story. > > > > > They could be lying to get a place in your country! Anyway... the world > is always ugly when it came to sex! I am shying away from this kind of > topics. :) > Uhh..no since the one guy works as an Engineer at the Corporate office in San Francisco. And the only reason I know is because my office is three blocks away. Do you want to make anymore stupid assumptions?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-20 19:16 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: from programming to religion and then.... sex? |
| Message-ID | <q6t7ee$i04$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #142071 |
On 3/19/2019 10:08 PM, fir is a sexy shemale wrote:
>
> Uhh..no since the one guy works as an Engineer at the Corporate office in San Francisco. And the only reason I know is because my office is three blocks away. Do you want to make anymore stupid assumptions?
>
No. Because I don't play refugee infiltration/invasion. ;)
--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
¤£É¶U! ¤£¶BÄF! ¤£½ä¿ú! ¤£´©¥æ! ¤£¥´¥æ! ¤£¥´§T! ¤£¦Û±þ! ¤£¨D¯«!
½Ð¦Ò¼{ºî´© (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-19 14:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d414bba5-81ee-4e32-ac44-dd4816ad5836@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #141995 |
On Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 9:45:38 AM UTC-5, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> Came across something interesting the other day. First of all, for the
> purposes of this discussion, assume two things:
> 1) You don't have any ideological objection to gotos.
> 2) You don't have any ideological objection to C99 style "intermixing".
>
> So, assume you like to have your declarations as close to the code that
> uses hem as possible. So, you write something like:
>
> ...
> goto somelabel;
> ...
>
>
> somelabel:
> int foo;
> (code that uses foo)
>
> But the compiler says that labels can only be associated with statements
> and declarations aren't statements. Makes sense, so you change the label
> line to:
>
> somelabel:;
>
> and everything is fine.
>
> Is this the approved fix? Should it be necessary? Is there any reason not
> to do this?
>
> --
> The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
> lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain
> in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
> http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/CLCtopics
As edge cases go, that's pretty awesome.
I'd personally do something like
label:
; // this statement intentionally left blank
or something similar to make it stand out.
As for the "should it be necessary", short of updating the grammar, the answer is
unfortunately yes. I'll admit, this is an interesting side effect of allowing intermixed
declarations and statements that I never saw coming. I haven't used a goto in anger
for well over a decade (at least in production code),
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c
csiph-web