Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #103722 > unrolled thread

Go to church

Started by"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
First post2017-02-12 05:01 -0800
Last post2017-05-04 16:29 -0700
Articles 13 on this page of 93 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c


Contents

  Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 05:01 -0800
    Whackjob (Was: Go to church) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-12 13:13 +0000
    Re: Go to church "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:33 +0800
      Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-12 19:51 -0800
        Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 20:51 -0800
          Re: Go to church Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2017-02-13 12:37 -0500
            Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 09:54 -0800
            Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-13 16:00 -0800
              Re: Go to church Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2017-02-16 19:27 -0700
                Re: Go to church Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-17 08:50 +0000
                Re: Go to church joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-01 18:46 -0700
    Re: Go to church Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2017-02-13 14:15 -0400
      Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 13:29 -0800
      Re: Go to church fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 14:01 -0800
        Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 15:24 -0800
      Re: Go to church "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 01:01 +0800
        Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 09:30 -0800
          Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 09:52 -0800
            Re: Go to church asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2017-02-15 00:42 -0800
              Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 05:11 -0800
          Re: Go to church "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 22:14 +0800
            Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 07:10 -0800
              Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 07:15 -0800
                Re: Go to church "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 00:03 +0800
                  Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 08:11 -0800
                    Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-15 17:41 -0800
                      Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 18:24 -0800
                        Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-15 19:08 -0800
                          Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-15 19:08 -0800
                            Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 19:25 -0800
                              Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-15 20:40 -0800
                                Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 03:35 -0800
                                  Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 04:39 -0800
                                  Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-16 16:54 -0800
                                    Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 17:15 -0800
                                      Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-16 17:19 -0800
                                        Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 18:25 -0800
                                    Re: Go to church Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-16 17:28 -0800
                                      Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-16 17:44 -0800
                                        Re: Go to church gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-17 09:59 +0000
                                          Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 03:34 -0800
                                            Re: Go to church Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-18 15:20 -0800
                                          Re: Go to church fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 06:31 -0800
                                      Re: Go to church gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-17 09:54 +0000
                                      Re: Go to church "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-02-23 16:12 -0800
                                        Re: Go to church Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-24 10:20 +0000
                                      Re: Go to church Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-01 13:54 -0700
                                        Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 14:05 -0700
                                          Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 15:57 -0700
                                            Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-01 16:45 -0700
              Re: Go to church "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 00:02 +0800
                Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 08:08 -0800
                Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-15 09:26 -0800
                  Re: Go to church "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 22:04 +0800
                    Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 06:20 -0800
                      Re: "Growing old exists because of sin"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 22:44 +0800
                        Re: "Growing old exists because of sin"? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 07:15 -0800
                          Re: "Growing old exists because of sin"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 00:09 +0800
                            Re: "Growing old exists because of sin"? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 08:26 -0800
                              Re: no interest in your magic "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 01:01 +0800
                                Re: no interest in your magic "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 09:10 -0800
                                  Re: no interest in your magic "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 16:27 +0800
                                    Re: no interest in your magic "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 04:33 -0800
                                      Re: no interest in your magic gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-19 13:39 +0000
                                        Re: no interest in your magic "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 06:09 -0800
                                          Re: no interest in your magic "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 07:43 -0800
                                            Re: no interest in your magic gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-19 16:03 +0000
                                          Re: no interest in your magic gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-19 16:05 +0000
                                            Re: no interest in your magic "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 09:20 -0800
              Re: Go to church David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 12:31 -0700
                Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 12:41 -0700
                  Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 14:33 -0700
                    Re: Go to church joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-03 17:27 -0700
                      Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 22:41 -0700
                        Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 05:23 -0700
                          Re: Go to church joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-04 19:51 -0700
                            Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 19:58 -0700
                  Re: Go to church joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-03 17:38 -0700
                    Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 18:23 -0700
                      Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 22:38 -0700
                    Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 22:39 -0700
                Re: Go to church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 14:34 -0700
    Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 07:33 -0800
      Re: Go to church Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2017-02-16 16:59 -0400
        Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-16 21:30 -0800
          Re: Go to church Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2017-02-19 01:15 -0400
            Re: Go to church "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 21:24 -0800
              Re: Go to church GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 09:27 +0100
                Re: Go to church joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-01 18:53 -0700
                  Re: Go to church GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 08:59 +0200
                    Re: Go to church joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-03 17:32 -0700
                      Re: Go to church GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 10:39 +0200
                        C#/Mono independence (Re: Go to church) joel.rees@gmail.com - 2017-05-04 16:29 -0700

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]


#109168

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-05-03 22:39 -0700
Message-ID<D5300C98.A359E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#109151
On 5/3/17, 5:38 PM, in article
82ab7827-f05c-4f50-b4e4-743cb8b289a2@googlegroups.com, "joel.rees@gmail.com"
<joel.rees@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 4:41:54 AM UTC+9, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> David Kleinecke wrote:
>>>  Islam is a reformed version of the Christianity of James the brother
>>> of Jesus. It's just as closely related to the teachings of Jesus
>>> as your theology is.
>> 
>> Islam is a false religion perpetuating a false god and is of the devil
>> himself.
>> It is flesh-focused, denies the deity of Christ, and has all ends in
>> religion, not in spirit.  People who don't convert are to be killed.
>> 
>> https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/10-reasons-not-peace.aspx
>> 
>> https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/myths/index.aspx
>> 
>> Flip through the various pages there.  Islam is wholly anti-Christ
>> wholly evil.
> 
> Just as there are people who falsely profess the Christ,
> there are people who falsely profess Islam.
> 
> All religions have their power-mongers and liars.
> It's going to be difficult to reach out to the elect
> who are sincere in their adherence to their traditions,
> if you deliberately let the liars and apostates
> among them become a wall between you and them.

Well stated.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#109138

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2017-05-03 14:34 -0700
Message-ID<D52F9AFC.A351D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#109130
On 5/3/17, 12:31 PM, in article
33949db2-d48a-4d88-abc7-2115cff644c5@googlegroups.com, "David Kleinecke"
<dkleinecke@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 7:10:53 AM UTC-8, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 9:14:21 AM UTC-5, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>> On 15/02/2017 1:30 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 12:01:40 PM UTC-5, Mr. Man-wai Chang
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I thought all religions on this planet and in this world originated from
>>>>> Middle-East. :)
>>>> Investigate it.  Pursue the real and true answer until it yields.  Do not
>>>> let assumption or preconception enter in.  Seek out the full and whole
>>>> truth, because then you will know to the best of your ability.
>>> 
>>> There is nothing but death in Middle-East...
>> 
>> Of course.  It is a predominately Muslim region.  The Muslim faith
>> is a false faith taught by Satan, and it teaches the exact opposite
>> of Christianity (even teaching that Jesus was only a prophet, and
>> not the Son of God virgin born):
>> 
>>     http://tinyurl.com/zzr8a5y
>> 
>> Islam is wholly evil.  The only reason there aren't more Muslim
>> killings is for the same reason there aren't more holy Christians:
>> people are apostate.  They do not follow the true tenants of their
>> faith.
>> 
>> If people truly followed the requirements of their Muslim faith,
>> Sharia Law would be enforced, and people who refused to convert
>> to Islam would be killed.
> 
> You don't understand Islam.
> 
> Islam is a reformed version of the Christianity of James the
> brother of Jesus. It's just as closely related to the teachings
> of Jesus as your theology is.

Not only does he make up stories about Islam, he knows little of the Bible,
refuses to click links which have quotes from the Bible, and now calls for
DEATH for those who do not share his worldview.

His religion (which is a version of Christianity, and not representative of
all Christians) is one of evil and support of violence.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#104011

From"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-16 07:33 -0800
Message-ID<3bc55a39-f111-4682-9bc7-b81423386ea2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#103722
On Sunday, February 12, 2017 at 8:01:34 AM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> That still small voice you hear on the inside, the one drawing you from
> within, reminding you of the things you should be doing, and pointing
> out the things you shouldn't be doing ... listen to it.  That voice was
> put there by God to guide you into all rightness, and away from
> everything wrong, hurtful and harmful (to yourself and others).
> 
> Even though you've done hurtful and harmful things to others, God
> still wants to forgive you.  He still loves you.  He still wants to turn
> your life around and give it to Him, to follow after the works of
> truth and light, rather than pursuits of self-interest in darkness.
> 
> We all need each other.  We need to help each other become the
> full and rich people we can be.  And we need God to help us overcome
> those things we cannot overcome on our own.
> 
> Go to church each week.  Learn about Jesus Christ.  Learn what it
> means to seek after and pursue that still, small voice on the inside,
> rather than continuing to drown it out with other things, ignoring
> it hoping it will go away.
> 
> This is your time to step forward in faith, to take heed of His inner call,
> to answer that call and pursue Him to that end He has for you, even
> forgiveness of your sin, and eternal life in Heaven in a body like
> the angels, beautiful, young, and strong.
> 
> A life you never imagined awaits you in pursuit of Him.  He redeems
> you and restores you to life (spiritual life), such that new things
> abound within your new man existence.  It is absolutely beyond that
> which you could imagine, because it's all completely new, through
> the new man nature, and the new life after the spirit.
> 
> God loves you, and will forgive you.  Just ask Him to forgive you
> from where you are.  He does the rest.  And then make the real
> conscious choice to listen to that inner voice, to go to church, to say
> no to sin in your life, and yes to holiness and pursuits by which
> you help others.
> 
> We have weaknesses as individuals, but we are strong together.  Go
> to church and be part of that community of strength, remembering
> that the same enemy at work out here in the world, also tries with
> extra effort to gain footholds in the church.  You must maintain your
> integrity and focus on Him first, and other things second, and then
> also teach and gently remind those in the church the same.
> Lead them continually back to where they should be, as He leads
> you from within.
> 
> Don't be prideful in your new faith.  Remember from where you cane
> and help others to come to forgiveness in Jesus in the like manner He
> forgave you, by having heard this message by spreading it and by
> teaching people about Him.
> 
> We need Him in our lives.  First, and out front.  He is our Redeemer.
> Our Salvation.  Our Guide.  Our Teacher.  And Je is also our Friend.
> 
> Never let the enemy's lies convince you ahead of the truth.  Remain
> in Him, focused, and teaching and rebuking, being ready to also be
> rebuked should you open your mouth and teach something falsely in
> ignorance.  He gently guides all of us down the straight and narrow
> path.  Because He loves us.
> 
> Love you,
> Rick C. Hodgin
> 
> PS - For those who hear His call and know what I'm talking about,
> welcome.  The Kingdom of God awaits you.  May you serve Him
> always in honest integrity, with a right mind and focus on leading
> more people to His Son Jesus, so they can also be forgiven and
> be saved.  Always done in much peace and much love.

It comes down to one thing for each of us who hear this message:  Jesus
calls to us in a way we can understand and know.  We know on the inside
His call is right and true, and He gives us free will to choose to answer
that call, or to ignore it.  All who answer are saved and are restored
to eternal life.  All who do not answer remain under condemnation because
of sin.

If you can hear His call, answer Him.  He reaches out to save your soul
from judgment, and death.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#104037

FromReal Troll <real.troll@trolls.com>
Date2017-02-16 16:59 -0400
Message-ID<o853q8$14q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#104011
On 16/02/2017 15:33, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> It comes down to one thing for each of us who hear this message:  Jesus
> calls to us in a way we can understand and know.
> Rick C. Hodgin

I hope you will discuss C or C++ along the same intense and vigour you 
are discussing Jesus.  If C or C++ doesn't excite you then how about C#?

Jesus is fine once in a while but to go on and on becomes monotonous and 
boring!!


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#104054

From"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-16 21:30 -0800
Message-ID<3c57562a-4b0a-415e-83d2-1852d5386f45@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#104037
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 3:58:56 PM UTC-5, Real Troll wrote:
> I hope you will discuss C or C++ along the same intense and vigour you 
> are discussing Jesus.  If C or C++ doesn't excite you then how about C#?

I do.  I am not as interested in C or C++ as I once was.  I have found the
communities surrounding them to be rigid and inflexible in terms of some
new features being added.  I have looked at C# and like it, but have no
plans to move to it.  I do plan to support C# at some point in my RDC
(Rapid Development Compiler) framework, which is an engine supporting
the creation of new programming languages.

My focus right now is on CAlive.  I plan to give every resource effort
I have to getting that product completed.  However, it is in a queue
with other products, so they each get a portion of my time.

> Jesus is fine once in a while but to go on and on becomes monotonous and 
> boring!!

I find the words to this song more to my need of Him:

    Chris Tomlin - Lord I Need You
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rR_Rdb1CTE

    "Lord I need you ... every hour I need you ... my one defense ...
     my righteousness ... Oh God, how I need you ..."

I am weak, RT.  He is strong.  I have no vision.  He has all vision.
I fail.  He succeeds.  I cannot stand on my own.  He holds me in His
Hand.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#104168

FromReal Troll <real.troll@trolls.com>
Date2017-02-19 01:15 -0400
Message-ID<o8b9fk$pfu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#104054
On 17/02/2017 05:30 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> I do.  I am not as interested in C or C++ as I once was.  I have found the
> communities surrounding them to be rigid and inflexible in terms of some
> new features being added.  I have looked at C# and like it, but have no
> plans to move to it.  I do plan to support C# at some point in my RDC
> (Rapid Development Compiler) framework, which is an engine supporting
> the creation of new programming languages.
>

To start C# compiler, you can download the source code from this link:

<https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn>

Microsoft has released the  C# code to the open source community and so 
anybody can see the code and suggest changes for the public to benefit 
from these changes.




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#104169

From"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-18 21:24 -0800
Message-ID<93646619-5d33-45f7-a450-e78eb85abc8d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#104168
Real Troll wrote:
> To start C# compiler, you can download the source code from this link:
>
> <https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn>
>
> Microsoft has released the C# code to the open source community
> and so anybody can see the code and suggest changes for the public to
> benefit from these changes.

I was amazed Microsoft did that.  Still am.

My goals with my RDC framework are to create a from scratch, ground-up
offering, which is given in honor of Jesus Christ, and not for other reasons.

He is worthy of all my effort, and I am pleased to do it.  I want to honor
Him with the fruits of my life.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#104173

FromGOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-19 09:27 +0100
Message-ID<20170219092711.cfe3b9975d421f89e9f7a9b1@gmail.com>
In reply to#104169
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:24:20 -0800 (PST)
"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was amazed Microsoft did that.  Still am.

Microsoft did that because nobody would like to use any privative language to
write softwares on POSIX systems, specially for servers despite the support of
Microsoft wannabe such as Miguel DE ICAZA.

I'm still waiting for a fork soon or later to see Microsoft's reaction...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#108997

Fromjoel.rees@gmail.com
Date2017-05-01 18:53 -0700
Message-ID<acb10af3-38b5-4c3d-aad7-3fc6acae63af@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#104173
On Sunday, February 19, 2017 at 5:29:13 PM UTC+9, GOTHIER Nathan wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:24:20 -0800 (PST)
> "Rick C. Hodgin" <> wrote:
> 
> > I was amazed Microsoft did that.  Still am.
> 
> Microsoft did that because nobody would like to use any privative language to
> write softwares on POSIX systems, specially for servers despite the support of
> Microsoft wannabe such as Miguel DE ICAZA.
> 
> I'm still waiting for a fork soon or later to see Microsoft's reaction...

???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#109013

FromGOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-02 08:59 +0200
Message-ID<20170502085948.15cc811e8ab877937a01c995@gmail.com>
In reply to#108997
On Mon, 1 May 2017 18:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
joel.rees@gmail.com wrote:

> ???
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29

Did anybody fork Mono?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#109150

Fromjoel.rees@gmail.com
Date2017-05-03 17:32 -0700
Message-ID<c50e2728-e658-424b-a486-6e238794a000@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#109013
On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 4:02:47 PM UTC+9, GOTHIER Nathan wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2017 18:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
> joel rees@somewhere wrote:
> 
> > ???
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29
> 
> Did anybody fork Mono?

Are you saying that Mono does not include a fork of C#, 
or implying that Mono itself is essentially owned by 
Microsoft, and technically not a fork?

--
Joel Rees

Trying to re-invent the entire information industry
all by myself (and other insanities):
http://defining-computers.blogspot.jp/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#109177

FromGOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-04 10:39 +0200
Message-ID<20170504103932.50aca338df0a46c28d90f0eb@gmail.com>
In reply to#109150
On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
joel.rees@gmail.com wrote:

> Are you saying that Mono does not include a fork of C#, 
> or implying that Mono itself is essentially owned by 
> Microsoft, and technically not a fork?

I don't the see the point to talk about a fork for a privative programming
language. My point is that C# is a closed programming language despite the fact
there is an open source implementation owned by its promoter (aka Microsoft).

Anyone who would really use C# as an open programming language for a non
Microsoft environment (POSIX systems for example), should fork Mono and makes a
schism from the Microsoft de facto standard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#109281 — C#/Mono independence (Re: Go to church)

Fromjoel.rees@gmail.com
Date2017-05-04 16:29 -0700
SubjectC#/Mono independence (Re: Go to church)
Message-ID<60091a4e-5f5a-4d40-8143-e2ff62d35193@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#109177
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 5:42:32 PM UTC+9, GOTHIER Nathan wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
> joel.rees@somewhere wrote:
> 
> > Are you saying that Mono does not include a fork of C#, 
> > or implying that Mono itself is essentially owned by 
> > Microsoft, and technically not a fork?
> 
> I don't the see the point to talk about a fork for a privative programming
> language. My point is that C# is a closed programming language despite the fact
> there is an open source implementation owned by its promoter (aka Microsoft).

Okay, looking at the home page of mono-project, I see that they now claim 
Microsoft sponsorship.

> Anyone who would really use C# as an open programming language for a non
> Microsoft environment (POSIX systems for example), should fork Mono and makes a
> schism from the Microsoft de facto standard.

I understand the sentiment, but I think it's a highly impractical idea.

Of course, I thought Mono was a highly impractical idea when they first 
started out. Trying to duplicate the technology of a company which is 
dedicated to making its stuff so complicated that only they can produce 
and sell compatible stuff is an exercise in futility.

Which means that, if you did fork Mono, you'd soon end up either stuck 
in a niche of history or sponsored by Microsoft. Futility or futility.

--
Joel Rees

Reinventing the industry all by myself:
http://defining-computers.blogspot.jp/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c


csiph-web