Re: Preprocessor Overheads

From	David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Preprocessor Overheads
Date	2017-02-07 09:57 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<o7c21j$13f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(24 earlier) <791b2540-1353-4ffa-95d5-98e3eaf66b65@googlegroups.com> <o79s53$3p8$1@dont-email.me> <d215e0d6-44de-4885-b68d-220446ddb644@googlegroups.com> <o7a1ti$ocg$1@dont-email.me> <cdb001aa-91d7-49c1-9c25-7c340aa3eb90@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/02/17 17:10, supercat@casperkitty.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 8:42:48 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote:
>> On 06/02/17 15:08, supercat wrote:
>>> Windows is designed around the concept of dynamic link libraries.  An
>>> application will generally run as a single process containing one or more
>>> AppDomains, each of which may be running one or more threads.  An
>>> application can create new AppDomains or load code into existing ones on
>>> the fly.
>>
>> No, Windows is designed around the concept of monolithic applications.
>> Sometimes these applications are divided into DLLs, but in most cases
>> the DLLs are specific to the application and are therefore not
>> equivalent to "shared libraries" found on other systems.  Even libraries
>> that obviously could be shared, such as run-time libraries from
>> development tools or common code libraries, are usually installed as
>> specific versions packaged alongside the application.
> 
> Many Windows applications support plug-in DLLs.  While such DLLs are often
> tied to an application, some applications endeavor to support plug-ins
> written for other applications; I don't have enough experience to know how
> well that usually works.
> 

DLLs are used for a variety of purposes - but when you have an
application split up into DLLs, those DLLs are as much part of the
monolithic application as if the code were directly integrated in the
exe file.

> 
>> DLLs are a handy way to modularise the code, and to get clear interfaces
>> between parts of a project.  They are particularly useful if there are
>> different groups working on the different parts, or if some parts are
>> optional.  But they don't match up with processes.
> 
> They're different from processes, with advantages and disadvantages.

Yes, in the same way that bicycles and cats are different, with their
advantages and disadvantages.  Processes and DLLs are not related concepts.

> 
>>> I don't know to what extent development systems make use of such abilities,
>>> but Windows allows DLLs to exchange information in an interactive fashion
>>> rather than merely having one generate some files which are then used as
>>> input for another.  What facilities do Unix/Linux have for inter-process
>>> communication?
>>
>> Linux provides several types of inter-process communication.  Files are
>> are a popular choice, because they are simple, efficient, scalable, easy
>> to understand, easy to debug, and you (usually) don't have to worry
>> about race conditions, deadlock, or other such issues.  On Linux if you
>> create a file (without any data), pass a copy of the handle onto another
>> process, then "delete" the file, you can still write to the file and
>> have the other process read it - but the OS never actually commits the
>> file to disk or creates a directory entry for it.  It works like a
>> normal file, but is entirely in ram (unless it gets too big) and is very
>> efficient.
> 
> In a Windows system, as I understand it, an "fopen" or "fclose" call won't
> return until the system has confirmed that it can be expected to succeed
> [it doesn't wait for everything to be physically written to disk, but it
> does allocate the space].  Returning success before it can be assured can
> improve performance in cases where things are in fact successful, but will
> make it harder to limit the damage done by any failures that occur.

I don't know enough details, but I think you cannot delete an open file
on Windows.  You have to have the directory entry for the file to exist,
unlike in *nix systems.

> 
> What would a Linux system do if several applications performed simultaneous
> fopen/fwrite/fclose sequences but the target volume didn't have enough space
> to let them all succeed?  Would some of the fclose() calls indicate failure,
> or would the application be told everything had succeeded even though it
> didn't?

Something will fail - just like if you do the same thing on Windows.

> 
>>> I would expect that there would be some tasks for which Windows could run
>>> an application targeting it more efficiently than Linux could run one that
>>> targeted Linux, and vice versa, but that what's most important is that
>>> applications which are designed around the strengths of the target system
>>> will run better than those that aren't.
>>
>> That is true.
> 
> Windows machines exist, and do represent a significant market share.  That
> would suggest that there would be some benefit to designing tools that could
> work efficiently on Windows as well as Linux.  If one could establish a
> baseline for what a devlopment system component should expect from its parent
> application, it should be fairly easy to adapt tools for use by from the
> command line or from within a Windows process.
> 

Command line or "within a Windows process" has nothing to do with it.

If you were writing a new compiler, it would be worth considering
writing it "the Windows way" to be efficient at running on Windows - and
it could also be efficient at running on Linux.  But it takes a lot more
development work - that's why people prefer making such systems "the
Unix way" and accepting that they will be less efficient on Windows.
When the llvm project was started, the developers concentrated on the
new part - the middle of the toolchain.  They used an existing C and C++
front-end (from gcc), and they used an existing assembler and linker
(from binutils).  This was much easier, safer, more modular, more
scalable and more flexible than trying to write a Windows-style "do
everything" tool.

Thread

Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-25 14:30 +0000
  Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-27 15:18 +0000
    Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-01 11:40 -0800
      Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-01 21:35 +0100
        Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-01 21:02 +0000
          Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-02 00:35 -0600
          Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-02 09:00 +0100
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-02 16:41 -0600
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 00:11 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 00:56 -0600
      Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-01 20:49 +0000
      Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 00:43 +0000
        Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-01 17:36 -0800
        Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-01 17:50 -0800
        Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-01 18:09 -0800
        Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-02 10:30 +0100
          Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 12:13 +0000
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-02 13:53 +0100
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 13:14 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-02 14:42 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 15:25 +0000
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 10:19 -0800
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-02-02 22:59 +0100
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-03 06:02 -0800
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 14:29 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-04 10:00 -0800
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-03 08:54 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-04 10:03 -0800
          Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 10:15 -0800
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 19:29 +0000
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-03 08:32 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 20:44 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 13:06 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-02 21:51 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-02 14:16 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 15:17 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-03 00:16 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 01:09 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 01:04 -0600
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 11:34 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-03 14:54 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 15:31 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-03 19:32 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 20:28 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-03 12:44 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 21:33 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 16:19 -0600
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 22:46 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 17:47 -0600
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-04 13:26 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 01:08 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-04 18:09 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 12:14 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-04 17:01 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 18:20 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-05 20:40 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 00:08 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-05 21:10 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 00:21 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-05 11:51 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 04:34 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-06 09:26 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-05 21:02 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-05 22:39 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 00:21 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-06 13:10 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 01:55 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-06 00:57 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:08 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 09:32 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-06 12:22 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-06 04:40 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 14:04 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-06 06:08 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 15:42 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-06 08:10 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-07 09:57 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-07 11:26 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-02-06 10:36 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-07 07:27 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-02-04 20:35 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-05 21:16 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-04 00:51 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 01:20 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-04 01:48 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 02:10 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-02-04 02:56 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-05 01:56 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-04 11:14 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 12:00 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 12:16 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-04 13:41 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 14:00 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-04 07:55 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-04 18:15 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-05 21:41 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-04 16:36 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads bart4858@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 11:24 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-04 21:08 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-04 13:41 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-04 14:26 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-04 23:27 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-05 00:18 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-04 19:56 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-05 11:01 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 04:04 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-05 14:03 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 06:56 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-05 09:01 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-05 20:53 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 13:34 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-06 11:15 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 14:30 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 14:39 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 14:58 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-05 15:23 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 15:40 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-05 15:05 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-06 13:22 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-09 07:48 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 09:15 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-10 08:05 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-06 00:08 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-08 21:20 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-05 04:08 -0600
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-05 02:40 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-09 09:27 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-09 18:04 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-05 18:07 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-05 21:55 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-05 23:07 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 01:02 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-03 22:07 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 11:25 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 04:26 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 12:36 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 04:59 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 13:09 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 05:24 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 13:41 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 08:29 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 17:00 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 09:24 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 18:31 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-02-06 10:55 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-06 03:02 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 19:55 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 20:11 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-03 17:30 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-03 18:00 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 21:27 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-03 21:35 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-02-06 10:53 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 14:06 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-06 05:22 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 14:49 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-06 05:59 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-06 14:12 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-06 06:13 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 15:22 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-06 15:27 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-02-06 15:10 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-02-06 14:55 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-06 16:57 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 21:17 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 20:20 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 21:29 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 21:03 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-03 22:33 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-04 13:29 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-04 04:19 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-02-03 15:18 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-02-03 21:17 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-03 13:39 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-02-03 23:38 +0000
                Re: printing int64_t objects Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-02-02 23:40 +0100
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-03 20:20 +1300
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 19:52 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-04 14:03 +1300
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-02 14:13 -0800
          Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-02 12:08 -0800
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-02 21:45 +0100
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-02 15:35 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 15:56 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-02 16:23 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-03 12:23 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 20:51 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-03 14:16 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 22:47 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-03 16:38 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-04 00:47 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-03 18:34 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-04 11:02 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-04 13:18 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-02-04 21:27 +0000
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-04 10:04 -0800
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 12:46 -0800
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-02 14:12 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 15:21 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-02 16:02 -0800
                Re: Preprocessor Overheads Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-02 16:13 -0800
        Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-02 14:16 -0800
          Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 05:03 -0800
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 16:41 -0600
              Re: Preprocessor Overheads Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-02-03 16:15 -0800
            Re: Preprocessor Overheads Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-04 10:13 -0800

csiph-web