Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #148302
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer |
| Date | Fri, 29 Nov 2019 13:38:25 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 31 |
| Message-ID | <lnk17i1hym.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <21e377ab-2a49-4f7e-bc18-72f1cee63204@googlegroups.com> <9d5ee6d4-607b-405f-83d9-afbe2b073cac@googlegroups.com> <76a74489-4a1f-4561-a01b-b2962a10bae4@googlegroups.com> <qromtr$3o3$1@dont-email.me> <2119c5dc-fc01-4a74-93f4-8027c7cc210e@googlegroups.com> <c97a16bb-4384-5e83-2c2f-1099b62be653@hrosenau.de> <43093894-ed52-47de-85f4-eadd92a1499e@googlegroups.com> <877e3j52do.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <86eexr8qlh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87v9r33211.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <861rtr8ndf.fsf@linuxsc.com> <Hb%DF.30271$s93.29962@fx19.iad> <lnlfrzulg0.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <Zy9EF.120213$P37.66802@fx33.iad> <lntv6m1j1k.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e0529dfbb494cbc11a767ed1ae1d9bb4"; logging-data="7765"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+nJ1IhO1wHMMr8uPl6zqmA" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:p5xt+R7XV8ZOCCbK/WLFbYBIGCU= sha1:oQawmh6/F9IK4R7m6Cm2qIhjItY= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:148302 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
> Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> writes:
[...]
>> Yes, I agree that isn't what it SAYS, but it could be what they meant to
>> say, but didn't word it right, for some of the reasons you mention.
>
[...]
>
> It's plausible that the rule *could* be that `sizeof vla_expression`
> doesn't evaluate `vla_expression`, but I don't think it's plausible that
> the committee didn't intend `vla_expression` to be evaluated (though
> it's possible they didn't sufficiently think through what that means).
Correction: Since there are cases (see below) where `sizeof vla_expression`
actually has to evaluate `vla_expression` (or at least part of it) to
determine the size, simply saying that it's not evaluated wouldn't work.
[...]
>> I think there may be a way
>> to use a compound literal expression to create a new type in an
>> expression, and then that type would need to be 'evaluated'
>
> Not directly, since the type name in a compound literal cannot be a VLA
> type. But as Tim points out, it can be done by dereferencing a compound
> literal of a pointer-to-VLA type.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2019-11-28 05:20 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 05:37 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer mark.bluemel@gmail.com - 2019-11-28 05:59 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-28 15:51 +0100
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 07:27 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Herbert Rosenau <nospam@hrosenau.de> - 2019-11-28 17:28 +0100
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 08:51 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-11-28 17:36 +0000
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-28 16:37 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-11-29 01:27 +0000
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-28 17:47 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-28 21:16 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-29 00:38 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-29 09:03 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-29 13:15 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-29 13:38 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-29 07:09 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-29 06:10 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-29 11:12 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-12-01 09:32 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-29 07:39 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-11-29 22:00 +0000
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-29 22:40 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-11-30 11:19 +0000
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-30 09:01 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-12-01 10:28 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-28 12:49 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 11:26 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-11-28 17:19 -0500
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-28 17:26 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-11-28 22:34 +0000
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-11-28 17:34 +0000
You gotta wonder why people say things like this! (Was: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-11-28 17:19 +0000
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-28 14:55 -0800
Re: sizeof object got by dereferencing uniniitalized pointer "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-30 15:28 -0800
csiph-web