Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #66536

Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter

From Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter
Date 2015-07-29 10:47 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <lnegjqn9di.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <mp8mes$hqh$1@dont-email.me> <mp8qh3$3g5$1@dont-email.me> <lnzj2glzxm.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <lnmvyfm078.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <mpavaf$3q8$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
> Le 29/07/2015 17:51, Keith Thompson a écrit :
>> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
>>> jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
>> [...]
>>>> lcc-win has two implementations of long double: the "standard" intel 80
>>>> bits long double in hardware (FPU) and a software implementation of 128
>>>> bit long doubles (called float128_t)
>> [...]
>>> BTW, I'm curious about your two different implementations of long
>>> double, 80 and 128 bits.  How do you specify which one you want
>>> to use?  If it's a compile-time option, does the linker prevent
>>> you from linking object files that don't use the same representation?
>>
>> You posted a followup to the above post, but you didn't answer the
>> quoted question.
>>
>> Can lcc-win treat your float128_t type as "long double", or is
>> float128_t always a distinct type?  If the size of long double is
>> configurable, how do you avoid mixing code using 80-bit long double
>> with code using 128-bit long double?
>
> Read the message I posted:
>
> lcc-win has two implementations of long double: the "standard" intel 80
> bits long double in hardware (FPU) and a software implementation of 128
> bit long doubles (called float128_t)
>
> long double is always Intel's 80 bits FPU representation
> float128_t is a distinct type that *could* be used as long double but 
> this is NOT done by the compiler since the software implementation is 
> 100 times slower than the hardware one...
>
> So: long double is always 80 Bits
> float128_t is always 128 bits
>
> If you use
>
> #ifdef USE_128_BIT_DOUBLE
> #include <float128.h>
> typedef float128_t Float;
> #else
> typedef long double Float;
> #endif
>
> Now always use "Float" in your code. Then, just with a command line 
> flag, you could switch between 80 and 128 bit representations.

Ok, thank you for the clarification.  So there's no issue of linking
translation units that use different representations for long
double; it's always 80 bits.  (Combining object files generated by
lcc-win with object files generated by Microsoft's compiler could
be problematic, assuming that's even supported, but I won't get
into that.)

BTW, I did read your message, which is why I asked the question.
You wrote:

    lcc-win has two implementations of long double: the "standard" intel
                                    --------------
    80 bits long double in hardware (FPU) and a software implementation
    of 128 bit long doubles (called float128_t)
       --------------------

In fact you have only an 80-bit implementation of "long double",
and a 128-bit floating-point type that *isn't* "long double".

Again, thank you for the clarification.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Handling numeric types in interpreter luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 19:33 -0700
  Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-14 07:31 +0200
  Handling numeric types in interpreter asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-07-14 00:35 -0700
  Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 08:55 -0700
  Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-15 23:18 +0100
    Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-24 00:21 -0700
      Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-24 08:36 -0700
        Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-24 11:04 -0700
          Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-24 12:25 -0700
            Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-24 22:21 -0400
              Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 02:28 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-25 15:16 +0100
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-07-25 11:03 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-25 10:05 -0700
              Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-07-25 12:32 +0000
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 06:12 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-25 10:08 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter ais523 <ais523@nethack4.org> - 2015-07-28 17:50 +0000
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-28 11:52 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-28 12:25 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-28 20:52 +0100
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-28 23:01 +0200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-28 14:44 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-29 09:43 +1200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-28 23:10 +0000
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-29 12:04 +1200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-07-29 02:39 +0200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-29 12:04 +0200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-29 14:58 +0000
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-29 14:14 +0200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-29 13:29 +0100
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-29 08:48 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-29 08:45 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-28 16:28 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-29 12:02 +0200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-29 08:51 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-07-29 18:35 +0200
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-29 10:47 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-25 15:46 -0500
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 14:08 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-25 15:42 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-26 00:31 -0500
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-25 17:48 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-25 17:31 -0500
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 15:57 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-07-26 01:07 +0100
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 17:26 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-07-25 22:25 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-25 19:04 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-26 00:23 -0500
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-26 08:24 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-26 06:36 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-26 16:30 -0500
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-26 15:42 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-26 16:28 -0500
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-26 18:57 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-26 16:20 -0700
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-25 15:58 -0700
              Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-25 12:56 -0400
                Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-25 14:18 -0700
      Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-24 18:06 +0000
        Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-24 11:16 -0700
          Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-24 23:06 +0000
            Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-24 16:21 -0700
  Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2015-07-15 19:13 -0700
    Re: Handling numeric types in interpreter luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 08:36 -0700

csiph-web