Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct |
| Date | Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:28:00 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 22 |
| Message-ID | <ln61252kr3.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mqdg0t$rv2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87tws5aash.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <mqdjo9$4b8$3@speranza.aioe.org> <353134d7-880d-44a5-81d9-1a317d3d2fd0@googlegroups.com> <56764795-b877-4b9b-bb88-8d04715d95da@googlegroups.com> <mqdngg$9he$1@dont-email.me> <lnk2t1crqq.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <mqe1gs$37a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mqe2t4$jlv$1@dont-email.me> <bc3d3593-e7ec-4ca8-b021-851e03af7d04@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="945944de09706c9b4e29b53c9d2efdc2"; logging-data="25332"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mArKv4tPqNljgm942xdXp" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:c5hn9ApVr1XgIO08vl/N85LaC6Y= sha1:/W6bdj/Yf70f2dNtbA2LbNzV/Gw= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:73163 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> writes:
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 1:11:58 AM UTC+1, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 12/08/15 00:46, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it's an "actual rule". It's really only common sense. A
>> quotation is a playing-back of something someone said (or, to be more
>> precise, wrote). If you change the text (other than in trivial ways,
>> such as whitespace), it is no longer a quotation.
>>
> If you transcribe speech verbatim it's full of "kinda"s and "see what
> I mean"s, and is very difficult to read. So journalists usually recast
> it into written sentences. Occasionally they don't, when they wish
> to imply that the speaker is an idiot. It's just a trick you should
> be aware of.
The context of the discussion is quoting *written* material on Usenet.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 12:20 -0700 Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-17 22:29 +0100 Re: C pointer semantics with dynamically allocated struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-17 15:28 -0700
csiph-web