Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: skipping bytes |
| Date | 2011-07-19 21:34 +0000 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <98mbitFse5U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4e24a281$0$1929$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <4e24a90b$0$8602$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <98lt37FgvmU4@mid.individual.net> <1abeef95-22ff-499a-b3c2-ab1a24e21c44@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
In article <1abeef95-22ff-499a-b3c2-ab1a24e21c44@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 19, 10:27 am, blm...@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myreal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > In article <4e24a90b$0$8602$bbae4...@news.suddenlink.net>, > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill Cunningham <nos...@nspam.invalid> wrote: > > > John Gordon wrote: > > > > In <4e24a281$0$1929$bbae4...@news.suddenlink.net> "Bill Cunningham" > > > > <nos...@nspam.invalid> writes: > > > > > >> I want to take a 700MB file and skip evey 200MB, so I thought of > > > >> this. > > > > > > You mean you want to copy the 700MB file to another file, omitting > > > > 200MB chunks? > > > > > >> long * space=malloc(sizeof(long)*500000); > > > > > > There's no need to allocate that much space for a simple copy > > > > operation. > > > > You can copy, say, 8K or 16K at a time without allocating a huge > > > > buffer. > > > > > I actually wanted to do something a little more difficult than just copy > > > the file. Every 200MB I want to save in a buffer about 8 bytes of data and > > > exchange 0x0000 for it. It doesn't have to be every 200M but it's such a > > > large file I thought of 200MB. Not using malloc() makes things so much > > > easier. It doesn't have to be exactly 8 bytes it could be 32. The important > > > thing is to correctly store the data read and save it correctly so it could > > > be put back. > > > > Do you have some end goal in mind, or are you doing this because it > > somehow strikes you as an interesting or entertaining problem in its > > own right? I can't make much sense of the above description and am > > (mildly) curious. > > > > [ snip ] > > > > You obviously haven't hung around this joint long enough. > Au contraire -- but in the past it has been a lot clearer what Bill wanted to accomplish, even when the posted code didn't seem very promising as a way to accomplish the stated goal. -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
skipping bytes "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-07-19 05:15 -0400
Re: skipping bytes John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-07-18 21:35 +0000
Re: skipping bytes "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-07-19 05:43 -0400
Re: skipping bytes blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 17:27 +0000
Re: skipping bytes Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 12:09 -0700
Re: skipping bytes blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 21:34 +0000
Re: skipping bytes "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-07-20 03:17 -0400
Re: skipping bytes blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 21:35 +0000
Re: skipping bytes "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-07-20 07:01 -0400
Re: skipping bytes "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2011-07-22 11:25 -0400
Re: skipping bytes Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 09:42 +1200
csiph-web