Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Code for strtol/strtoul |
| Date | Sat, 21 Mar 2015 15:54:55 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 54 |
| Message-ID | <87sicyufk0.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mejjh4$i17$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mek1lo$nl8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <878ueqvylj.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c77ff4d35e33d1c939d3461ebde8dd0d"; logging-data="32571"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+g97UElLtgqm2nIQLBTZrf" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:gdJsxrP6y4loKc36n0wL49f6Bw0= sha1:+LhJol31GZ/6uWOy8N8xjJN7t08= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:58616 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
[...]
> Yes, a leading + or - sign is permitted. "If the subject sequence
> begins with a minus sign, the value resulting from the conversion is
> negated (in the return type)." Negation is well defined for unsigned
> types.
[...]
But that raises an interesting question.
Assume LONG_MAX==2147483647, LONG_MIN==-LONG_MIN-1 (32-bit
2's-complement). How does
strtol("-2147483648", NULL, 0)
work?
The obviously useful behavior is for it to return LONG_MIN and
*not* set errno. But look at the description in the standard
(N1570 7.22.1.4p5):
If the subject sequence has the expected form and the value
of base is zero, the sequence of characters starting with the
first digit is interpreted as an integer constant according to
the rules of 6.4.4.1.
So far so good; "2147483648" has the form of an integer constant.
If the subject sequence begins with a minus sign, the value
resulting from the conversion is negated (in the return type).
So *first* the value of the digit sequence is determined, and
*then* that value is negated if the string began with a minus sign.
But 2147483648 is outside the range of the return type. There is
no value of type long that you can negate and yield -2147483648,
so there's nothing that be "negated (in the return type)" to yield
that value.
In the glibc implementation, strtol("2147483648", NULL, 0) returns
LONG_MAX and sets errno to ERANGE (which is the correct behavior).
But strtol("-2147483648", NULL, 0) returns -2147483648 and doesn't
set errno -- which is perfectly sensible and useful behavior, and
probably what was intended. But I don't see how it's consistent
with the requirements stated in the standard. There *should*
be a special case for LONG_MAX and LLONG_MAX for strtoul, strtoll,
but it's not stated.
Is this a bug in the standard, or am I missing something?
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-21 12:09 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-21 11:33 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-21 11:47 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-21 15:58 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2015-03-21 16:10 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-21 16:34 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-21 16:10 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-03-21 12:53 -0400
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-21 14:18 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-21 22:46 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-21 15:23 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-21 23:42 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-21 16:06 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-22 00:29 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-21 20:18 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-21 15:54 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-22 08:34 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 19:42 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-25 10:40 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 16:17 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-25 20:27 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 21:50 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-25 06:54 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:18 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-25 09:57 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-26 07:07 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-26 14:22 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-03-26 00:17 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:07 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-03-28 02:53 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 08:19 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 16:13 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-25 13:42 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 17:20 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-26 04:16 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-03-26 00:27 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-26 13:44 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 07:13 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-03-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-29 15:13 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 09:47 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-26 15:00 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-27 07:12 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-26 15:09 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-26 22:13 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-26 15:20 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-30 09:59 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-30 06:38 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-30 14:41 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-04-06 12:52 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-27 18:07 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-29 15:17 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-29 15:26 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 07:09 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-30 10:02 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-29 18:53 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 15:38 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-21 16:48 -0500
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-22 20:45 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2015-03-23 09:40 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-23 09:46 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2015-03-23 18:44 +0800
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-03-23 20:29 -0500
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-24 08:12 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 05:27 -0500
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-24 07:03 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2015-03-23 22:40 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-24 17:17 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 21:42 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-25 17:55 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 08:43 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-26 14:15 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 14:53 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-29 11:04 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-30 12:34 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 21:20 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 22:31 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:30 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 08:24 -0700
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-25 22:43 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-27 19:18 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Steve Thompson <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:02 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-27 16:10 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Steve Thompson <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2015-03-27 22:44 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-29 15:18 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-29 17:35 +0200
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-28 03:57 -0500
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-28 14:09 +0100
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:58 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-28 11:33 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-29 08:49 +1300
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-28 22:11 +0000
Re: Code for strtol/strtoul Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-29 11:30 +1300
csiph-web