Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> |
| Newsgroups | sci.math, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.fortran, comp.lang.pl1 |
| Subject | Re: Wiki |
| Date | Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:48:00 +0100 |
| Lines | 48 |
| Message-ID | <87iprowmun.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <4dae2a4b$0$55577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dbd6e9c$0$12957$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <925saiFj03U7@mid.individual.net> <4dbe2304$0$12961$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <iplmk8$2s6$1@gosset.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4dda0486$0$67782$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dda09ca$0$6629$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4e098093$0$79550$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <1bei2e54d4.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> <4e0a6b42$0$79552$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <87vcvpw32g.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> <87zkl07fn7.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net xJq/lVUU8HSxJ+mDLwmvVwmK9s/WnZ5bL5aF02f+Aaxb66AtCw |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:ZlIPtFSU5n8Q5w//5NcMi56SVIQ= sha1:u9dO937tZEMecpKJdwuauoyKkSw= |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:7226 comp.lang.fortran:8791 comp.lang.pl1:475 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> writes: > Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> writes: >> "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> writes: >> > "Joe Pfeiffer" <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote in message news:1bei2e54d4.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net... >> > | "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> writes: >> > | >> > | > "Georg Bauhaus" <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote in message >> > | > news:4dda09ca$0$6629$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net... >> > | > | >> > | > | According to Wikipedia, counting all CPUs sold, even the share >> > | > | of 8bit µcontrollers is more than a half. (They give sources for >> > | > | the numbers.) >> > | > >> > | > Wikipedia is not a reliable source. >> > | >> > | It's as reliable as any encyclopedia. What it isn't, is original >> > | research -- and it doesn't pretend to be. >> > | >> > | Do you have a more reliable source that says otherwise? >> > >> > A real encyclopedia. >> >> (assuming "real" == "printed") Which one? >> >> And much more importantly, what does it say about the proportion of >> total CPUs sold that are 8 bit microcontrollers? > > Well, I used to work for a top-10 semiconductor manufacturer and there, > by number of units, microcontrollers easily outsold 32-bit CPUs. > > Even if every moderately advanced phone has at least 3 32-bit ARM > cores on it (many have 7 or more). The number of microcontrollers in > automative applications absolutely dwarfs that. I know we were > supplying 30 processors for some vehicles, and I know we weren't the > only supplier. > > Every time they make things like microwaves more hi-tech so that they > need a 16- or 32-bit processor, they find something even dumber to > put 8-bit microcontrollers into. Just for the record, I have no dog in the fight about the proportion of microprocessors. I'm just responding to the point that "Wikipedia is not a reliable source" and "a real encyclopedia" is with a gentle request for what a real encyclopedia says on the subject. -- Online waterways route planner | http://canalplan.eu Plan trips, see photos, check facilities | http://canalplan.org.uk
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-04-28 11:14 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "e p chandler" <epc8@juno.com> - 2011-04-28 07:42 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Gib Bogle <g.bogle@auckland.ac.nz> - 2011-04-29 12:55 +1200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2011-04-28 21:50 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-29 14:09 +1200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-28 23:01 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-29 15:09 +1200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Uno <merrilljensen@q.com> - 2011-05-08 00:34 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Marni Zollinger <marni@altgreendesigns.com> - 2011-05-10 23:38 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-04-29 07:15 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2011-04-28 23:16 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-04-29 02:34 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Uno <Uno@example.invalid> - 2011-04-29 01:04 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-04-30 20:48 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Uno <Uno@example.invalid> - 2011-05-04 19:12 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-04-29 08:13 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-04-29 17:41 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-04-29 12:53 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-05-05 16:38 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-04-29 22:45 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> - 2011-04-29 23:36 -0500
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-04-29 22:43 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-04-29 19:43 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Thad Smith <ThadSmith@acm.org> - 2011-05-01 08:31 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-02 07:58 +1200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-01 20:01 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-02 12:42 +1200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-01 22:34 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-02 02:50 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Thad Smith <ThadSmith@acm.org> - 2011-05-01 21:21 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-05-02 08:31 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-05-23 16:52 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-05-23 14:18 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-05-23 17:20 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-05-23 16:52 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-05-23 16:52 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-05-23 16:53 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> - 2011-05-23 09:16 +0200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Ilmari Karonen <usenet2@vyznev.invalid> - 2011-05-26 22:06 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-28 17:19 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "Vinzent Hoefler" <0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776eeb@t-domaingrabbing.de> - 2011-06-28 10:44 +0200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-28 10:19 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> - 2011-06-28 11:14 +0200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-28 21:59 +1000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-28 13:16 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-06-28 11:44 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 08:33 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> - 2011-06-28 15:53 +0200
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Brian Salter-Duke <b_duke@bigpond.com.au> - 2011-06-28 22:39 +0000
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 08:32 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-28 14:03 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 10:25 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-28 16:01 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 20:20 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-29 01:38 -0700
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-28 10:04 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-28 17:36 +0100
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-28 10:51 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 20:27 -0400
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-28 19:00 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-29 19:48 +0300
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-28 10:52 -0600
Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2011-06-28 13:06 -0400
Re: Wiki "robin" <robin51@dodo.mapson.com.au> - 2011-06-29 10:00 +1000
Re: Wiki James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 20:25 -0400
Re: Wiki Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> - 2011-06-29 16:03 +0700
Re: Wiki Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-30 13:39 +0100
Re: Wiki Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2011-07-01 22:15 +0100
Re: Wiki Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-28 18:52 -0600
Re: Wiki James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-29 05:52 -0400
Re: Wiki Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-06-29 10:12 -0400
Re: Wiki Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-29 14:29 -0600
Re: Wiki Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-06-29 07:43 +0100
Re: Wiki Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-06-29 10:10 -0400
Re: Wiki Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-29 19:42 +0300
Re: Wiki Chris H <chris@phaedsys.org> - 2011-06-29 18:09 +0100
Re: Wiki Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-06-29 18:48 +0100
Re: Wiki Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-06-29 09:50 -0400
csiph-web