Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation |
| Date | 2015-09-08 20:32 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87fv2oogft.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <e9abe69a-2532-44f3-be7b-aaa236783cfb@googlegroups.com> <fe75fd6a-a46e-42db-ac7c-3d9ab9fc8da0@googlegroups.com> <mntum4$pf0$1@news.albasani.net> <73cc6924-226c-4615-9d03-fc7f7a5e4667@googlegroups.com> |
supercat@casperkitty.com writes: > On Sunday, July 12, 2015 at 9:47:45 AM UTC-5, Johannes Bauer wrote: >> Which completely defies the purpose of using the system stack. Because >> there you don't have to free because free is implicit at the end of a >> function scope when the stackframe is cleared. > > A well-designed stack-allocate mechanism would have included a stack-free > function and required that code must use it to free objects in the reverse > order of allocation. Such requirements would have meant that every platform > that can run a reasonable dialect of C could support code using such > functions merely by chaining them to "malloc" and "free", but platforms which > can benefit from distinguishing between temporary and persistent objects > could make use of that knowledge. Even platforms would require that such > objects be allocated on the heap rather than the CPU stack may be able to > benefit from having separate functions for temporary allocations (e.g. by > maintaining a pre-allocated area for such allocations which is separate from > the main heap). > > The lack of a "free" function is bad in a number of ways: > > 1. It's incompatible with a pattern of "read size, allocate array, read and > process data, release array, read next size, etc." since memory that gets > stack-allocated within a method can't be freed. > > 2. On many platforms it makes it impossible to use a compatibility library > to allow code which is written to use alloca() to be run on a platforms > which doesn't include explicit support for it. > > 3. Unless a compiler adds some rather sophisticated alloca-related support, > it precludes the possibility of alloca() using a heap allocation rather > than a stack allocation in cases where stack memory is scarce. > > Having a function which allocates memory take care of releasing it isn't > hard, and while I could see semantic benefit to having a compiler squawk if > stack-allocate/stack-free calls aren't balanced, I don't see any upside to > the implicit freeing of alloca() memory which are even remotely close to > outweighing the drawbacks. I'm not good at assessing advantages and drawbacks, but you can always make yourself use such a language (in fact I have done so, knowing that alloca is fast on some target systems and simply absent in others). I.e. you write salloc and sfree which are either malloc and free or are alloca and an empty stub. It's not the same as having mandated features of course, but I suspect its the kind of thing that is considered by standards committees. (And if I understand the intent, you don't get number 3 as that's on the implementation side.) -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 02:23 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-07-12 11:48 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-07-12 11:48 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2015-07-12 13:33 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-12 06:54 -0500
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-12 06:17 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-07-12 16:47 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-12 11:12 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-08 11:53 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 12:16 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-08 15:46 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:12 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-09 06:53 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 16:06 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-09 16:17 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 16:26 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-09 19:22 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 19:55 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-09 20:46 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-09 20:50 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-11 23:59 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 06:22 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 21:10 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-10 07:08 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 08:17 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-10 08:54 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 09:19 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-10 16:55 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 18:41 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-11 09:04 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 10:17 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-11 11:34 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 11:47 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-11 13:44 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 17:52 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-11 11:37 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-09-10 08:24 -0400
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 05:55 -0700
RDC (Was: lalloc() -- local stack allocation) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-09-10 13:01 +0000
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-09-11 00:29 -0400
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 05:37 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-09-11 22:48 -0400
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 20:05 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 20:22 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 11:57 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 04:34 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 07:28 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:44 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 13:02 +1200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:25 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 13:42 +1200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 19:11 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 04:27 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 19:44 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-09-11 23:01 -0400
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-09-12 11:12 +0100
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:55 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-09-12 14:16 +0100
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 06:24 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-12 10:57 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 11:13 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 19:31 +0100
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-09-12 19:20 +0000
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 12:06 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-12 14:24 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 19:22 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 14:54 +1200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 20:18 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 16:20 +1200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:43 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-12 14:02 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 04:25 +0200
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-09-12 10:32 +0100
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-09 16:23 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 16:38 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-09 17:01 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 17:08 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-09-09 17:37 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:06 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-09-10 10:54 +0100
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-09-09 16:24 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-09-08 20:32 +0100
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation jadill33@gmail.com - 2015-09-08 13:25 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-12 10:17 -0700
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation gordonb.zziiu@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-07-27 22:41 -0500
Re: lalloc() -- local stack allocation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-28 08:35 -0700
csiph-web