Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:15:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <50416196.6B6C@mindspring.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:15:02 -0400 |
| From | pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-To | pfiland@mindspring.com |
| Organization | PF |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Request for source code review |
| References | <87bohty09k.fsf@panda.goosenet.in> <87y5kvdtcm.fsf@panda.goosenet.in> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 25 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 4.154.218.27 |
| X-Trace | sv3-a8j8brYAAqvatRaYvdBfchshW/KphryX8TtB4t3h76PqMlKUx86isjurqEC27eci2zoJDT7KH2MAXGK!V3PqNpd9OadgtM/v4RXVCq/NIjVc83d6FcOjaCYk4UmA2so2Tticna3irhzNHolbpMJ5ULYKKi+H!Ywfy9FUJBg== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1574 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:25682 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Udyant Wig wrote: > > /* gauss.h begins */ > > #include <stdio.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <time.h> > > #include "utils.h" As a matter of style, my preference is to place the standard headers after the nonstandard header files. I prefer to write header files in such a way that they do not need to have standard headers #included before them. Placing the nonstandard header files first, gives the compiler a chance to check that I have written them that way. -- pete
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 00:49 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-29 19:43 +0000
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 18:46 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-29 22:27 +0100
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 09:44 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Seungbeom Kim <musiphil@bawi.org> - 2012-09-07 17:31 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-08 12:41 +1200
Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 04:06 +0100
Re: Request for source code review 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-07 23:50 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 12:28 +0100
Re: Request for source code review "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-29 22:58 +0100
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 09:48 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 18:55 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 10:06 +0530
Re: Request for source code review lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-29 21:59 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 18:51 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-30 13:44 +0100
Re: Request for source code review lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 03:24 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-30 17:04 +1200
Re: Request for source code review James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-30 07:43 -0400
Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-31 20:43 +1200
Re: Request for source code review Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-31 21:18 -0500
Re: Request for source code review James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Request for source code review Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-01 20:45 -0500
Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-02 15:11 +1200
Re: Request for source code review Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-01 23:43 -0500
Re: Request for source code review Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-09-01 07:40 +0000
Re: Request for source code review Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-30 05:10 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 19:14 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-30 16:42 +0100
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 19:44 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 20:03 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-31 13:34 -0700
Re: Request for source code review Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-09-01 07:49 +0000
Re: Request for source code review Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-01 02:53 -0700
Re: Request for source code review pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-08-31 21:15 -0400
Re: Request for source code review Jan Kuiken <jan.kuiken@quicknet.nl> - 2012-08-31 19:55 +0200
Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-09-02 15:39 +0530
Re: Request for source code review Jan Kuiken <jan.kuiken@quicknet.nl> - 2012-09-02 19:57 +0200
csiph-web