Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #86415
| From | Muttley@dastardlyhq.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: What is the good of new way of coding? |
| Date | 2022-09-19 08:30 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tg99bn$ob4$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tg4p7j$6kku$1@dont-email.me> <tg4qtf$1ub0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tg4r45$6q5f$1@dont-email.me> <tg4rnu$aeq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tg4sug$6vcn$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 18:34:44 +0200 Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote: >Am 17.09.2022 um 18:13 schrieb Muttley@dastardlyhq.com: >>>>> No, you can't unroll variable. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure the same functionality could be achieved in older C++ or >>>> even C albeit with more lines of code. >>>> >>> >>> Show me. >>> >> >> I don't have a c++ 20 compiler so I can't see what it does and I have better >> things to do on a saturday than run it in my head. >> > >Without C++20 you would have to unroll the fold expressions >N times, in this case 10.000 times. Have fun ! Has c++20 just invented recursion then? I've never seen anything in C++ that couldn't be done in C albeit with much more - often messy - code. I doubt that has changed.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is the good of new way of coding? wij <wyniijj2@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 05:46 -0700
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:03 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 14:50 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 17:31 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 15:59 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 18:03 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 16:13 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 18:34 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 19:55 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 12:03 -0700
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-18 16:21 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-19 08:30 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 10:37 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-19 08:54 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 11:13 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:23 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:38 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Andreas Kempe <kempe@lysator.liu.se> - 2022-09-17 14:37 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 16:40 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Andreas Kempe <kempe@lysator.liu.se> - 2022-09-17 20:52 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-09-17 22:18 +0100
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-09-17 22:21 +0100
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Andreas Kempe <kempe@lysator.liu.se> - 2022-09-17 21:31 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 14:52 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 17:32 +0200
csiph-web